Zimmerman trial

[Pudfark]

Like I said earlier, that's the purpose.

Edit: Now I get it.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Hollywood/ ... y-Movement

[callmeslick]

Breitbart=Serial Lie Site

[Pudfark]

C'mon Slick...try to keep an open mind. Instead of "purge"ing.

[callmeslick]

no better description of Breitbart that is Work Suitable.

[Pudfark]

Breitbart=Serial Lie Site

Please, at your leisure and convenience....present proof.

[callmeslick]

don't have that sort of time, but essentially anyone who wishes to go through the past 8 years of Breitbart claims will find an extremely low accuracy rate.

[HappyHappy]

don't have that sort of time, but essentially anyone who wishes to go through the past 8 years of Breitbart claims will find an extremely low accuracy rate.

Not as low as yours, note your comment preserved in my sig below.

HH

[CUDA]

don't have that sort of time, but essentially anyone who wishes to go through the past 8 years of Breitbart claims will find an extremely low accuracy rate.

So you make a blanket statement slamming the credibility of an organization, yet don't have time to back it up with facts.

Isnt that the definition of libel?

[Pudfark]

don't have that sort of time, but essentially anyone who wishes to go through the past 8 years of Breitbart claims will find an extremely low accuracy rate.

Everything, totally, I've written on these forums, I've backed up, all of it.

Your quote above does fit the implied criteria here in the "Frivolous Rambling" arena.

[Reservoir_Dog]

Everything, totally, I've written on these forums, I've backed up, all of it.

It's old news and it was political in the sense that it was used to obscure other news. In short, it was a smoke screen that served it's purpose then. To resurrect it now?
Would be to renew it's original purpose. My opinion.