True or false

No Politics.
Post Reply
fatman
Posts: 4677
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 4:40 am

True or false

Post by fatman »

Image
User avatar
Reservoir_Dog
Posts: 8858
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.

Re: True or false

Post by Reservoir_Dog »

If I can only pick one or the other ... I guess I pick true.
fatman
Posts: 4677
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 4:40 am

Re: True or false

Post by fatman »

True that :D
User avatar
ginger_cat
Posts: 173
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 7:19 pm

Re: True or false

Post by ginger_cat »

They fucking arrest you in the UK for offending someone [usually when bad language is used] nowadays - section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986 - lazy coppers use it when swear-words are used and they've got nothing else that they can arrest someone for.
5 Harassment, alarm or distress.

(1)A person is guilty of an offence if he—

(a)uses threatening [F1or abusive] words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour, or

(b)displays any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening [F1or abusive],

within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress thereby.

(2)An offence under this section may be committed in a public or a private place, except that no offence is committed where the words or behaviour are used, or the writing, sign or other visible representation is displayed, by a person inside a dwelling and the other person is also inside that or another dwelling.

(3)It is a defence for the accused to prove—

(a)that he had no reason to believe that there was any person within hearing or sight who was likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress, or

(b)that he was inside a dwelling and had no reason to believe that the words or behaviour used, or the writing, sign or other visible representation displayed, would be heard or seen by a person outside that or any other dwelling, or

(c)that his conduct was reasonable.
Post Reply