The attack at Ft. Hood
- callmeslick
- Posts: 16473
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
- Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
Re: The attack at Ft. Hood
it has been a topic, far in the past, among Ruggie, myself and others.
Re: The attack at Ft. Hood
callmeslick something tells me that you think the idea of all US military being disarmed while on post
is a good idea. Clinton signed that into law in 1993.
When I was in the USAF all US Army and Marine grunts had a rifle or a side arm on them
while on duty, that means nearly at all times.
I doubt that rag head would have got far if everyone was armed.
HH
is a good idea. Clinton signed that into law in 1993.
When I was in the USAF all US Army and Marine grunts had a rifle or a side arm on them
while on duty, that means nearly at all times.
I doubt that rag head would have got far if everyone was armed.
HH
- callmeslick
- Posts: 16473
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
- Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
Re: The attack at Ft. Hood
I don't know what gave you that insight. Actually, I wouldn't like to think that a base would be all that vulnerable, stateside, so that MP's couldn't handle it. At any rate, that isn't what is being discussed here.HappyHappy wrote:callmeslick something tells me that you think the idea of all US military being disarmed while on post
is a good idea. Clinton signed that into law in 1993.
When I was in the USAF all US Army and Marine grunts had a rifle or a side arm on them
while on duty, that means nearly at all times.
I doubt that rag head would have got far if everyone was armed.
HH
Re: The attack at Ft. Hood
Well the dude is paralysed never to walk again and apparently is in some pain lets just hope they short change him on his pain meds
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,26 ... 09,00.html
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,26 ... 09,00.html