Page 2 of 3

Re: Zimmerman trial

Posted: Wed Jun 12, 2013 12:03 am
by Pudfark
Like I said earlier, that's the purpose. 8-)

Edit: Now I get it.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Hollywood/ ... y-Movement

Re: Zimmerman trial

Posted: Wed Jun 12, 2013 7:31 am
by callmeslick
Breitbart=Serial Lie Site

Re: Zimmerman trial

Posted: Wed Jun 12, 2013 11:24 am
by Pudfark
C'mon Slick...try to keep an open mind. Instead of "purge"ing. ;)

Re: Zimmerman trial

Posted: Wed Jun 12, 2013 8:32 pm
by callmeslick
no better description of Breitbart that is Work Suitable.

Re: Zimmerman trial

Posted: Wed Jun 12, 2013 11:12 pm
by Pudfark
callmeslick wrote:Breitbart=Serial Lie Site
Please, at your leisure and convenience....present proof. :)

Re: Zimmerman trial

Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2013 7:14 am
by callmeslick
don't have that sort of time, but essentially anyone who wishes to go through the past 8 years of Breitbart claims will find an extremely low accuracy rate.

Re: Zimmerman trial

Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2013 7:17 am
by HappyHappy
callmeslick wrote:don't have that sort of time, but essentially anyone who wishes to go through the past 8 years of Breitbart claims will find an extremely low accuracy rate.


Not as low as yours, note your comment preserved in my sig below.

HH

Re: Zimmerman trial

Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2013 8:24 am
by CUDA
callmeslick wrote:don't have that sort of time, but essentially anyone who wishes to go through the past 8 years of Breitbart claims will find an extremely low accuracy rate.
So you make a blanket statement slamming the credibility of an organization, yet don't have time to back it up with facts.

Isnt that the definition of libel?

Re: Zimmerman trial

Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2013 10:18 am
by Pudfark
callmeslick wrote:don't have that sort of time, but essentially anyone who wishes to go through the past 8 years of Breitbart claims will find an extremely low accuracy rate.
Everything, totally, I've written on these forums, I've backed up, all of it.

Your quote above does fit the implied criteria here in the "Frivolous Rambling" arena. :)

Re: Zimmerman trial

Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2013 2:34 pm
by Reservoir_Dog
Pudfark wrote:Everything, totally, I've written on these forums, I've backed up, all of it.
Pudfark wrote:It's old news and it was political in the sense that it was used to obscure other news. In short, it was a smoke screen that served it's purpose then. To resurrect it now?
Would be to renew it's original purpose. My opinion.
:roll: