Lets get a little technical: Compression ratios

No Politics.
HappyHappy

Lets get a little technical: Compression ratios

Post by HappyHappy »

Ok you gurus of airplanes and all things that use heat engines for propulsion.

Why does a higher compression ratio deliver greater specific power (efficiency).

Piston engines are the object of the question, but the same goes for gas turbines.

This could be fun :D

One hint. 100% burn can be achieved in a gasoline engine at as little as 6:1
So a complete burn is not the reason.

HH
User avatar
Reservoir_Dog
Posts: 8858
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.

Re: Lets get a little technical: Compression ratios

Post by Reservoir_Dog »

I'll assume you're referring to thermal efficiency.
High compression ratios = more time for the expansion cycle, less fuel can be used at the same combustion temperature, more mechanical power is generated, less heat loss through the exhaust system.
It's also why diesel engines are so efficient.
HappyHappy

Re: Lets get a little technical: Compression ratios

Post by HappyHappy »

Very close.
Not quite.
The remaiming item you missed is what time are you referring to?

HH
fatman
Posts: 4677
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 4:40 am

Re: Lets get a little technical: Compression ratios

Post by fatman »

I was waiting on the CIA report but furloughs abound
Pudfark

Re: Lets get a little technical: Compression ratios

Post by Pudfark »

Fats....you slay/sleigh me....that was funny.... :lol:
User avatar
Juha
Posts: 213
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 3:57 pm
Location: Bonn, Germany

Re: Lets get a little technical: Compression ratios

Post by Juha »

Carnot cycle gives the answer:

Image

Efficiency can be seen as a ratio between High and Low temperatures in the cycle -> higher compression allows higher temperature difference in the work cycle.
(Because compressing gas makes it hotter)

Happy, HH?
All I ever wanted, was my own way
HappyHappy

Re: Lets get a little technical: Compression ratios

Post by HappyHappy »

Juha wrote:Carnot cycle gives the answer:

Image

Efficiency can be seen as a ratio between High and Low temperatures in the cycle -> higher compression allows higher temperature difference in the work cycle.
(Because compressing gas makes it hotter)

Happy, HH?

nailed it :D
User avatar
Juha
Posts: 213
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 3:57 pm
Location: Bonn, Germany

Re: Lets get a little technical: Compression ratios

Post by Juha »

Counter question: Why the compression ratio is usually lowered, when an engine is rebuilt with a turbo charger?
All I ever wanted, was my own way
HappyHappy

Re: Lets get a little technical: Compression ratios

Post by HappyHappy »

Juha wrote:Counter question: Why the compression ratio is usually lowered, when an engine is rebuilt with a turbo charger?
Pressure ratio (effective compression) must reflect the octane or performance
number (over 100 Octane) of the fuels in use. There is a loss in efficiency at lower power settings.
Modern automotive thinking is to use a very small highly boosted engine
to counter this by having a small engine at low power "traffic" situations
and running nearly constant boost in high power usage scenarios.

Aircraft engines use turbocharging mostly as altitude compensation
mantaining sea level boost at the carb inlet. Compression remains unchanged
but usually lower than in automotive. WWII era engines are typically 6 to 7:1

HH
User avatar
Juha
Posts: 213
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 3:57 pm
Location: Bonn, Germany

Re: Lets get a little technical: Compression ratios

Post by Juha »

Yep.

:lol:
All I ever wanted, was my own way
Post Reply