you want some SERIOUS transformation?
- callmeslick
- Posts: 16473
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
- Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
you want some SERIOUS transformation?
As of today, corporations are 'citizens' too, and thus can exercise unlimited financial support to political campaigns. This won't end well. I'd love to hear from the Libertarian(s) in the crowd on this one........
- Reservoir_Dog
- Posts: 8858
- Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
- Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.
Re: you want some SERIOUS transformation?
I wonder who Microsoft is going to put into the White House.
- callmeslick
- Posts: 16473
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
- Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
Re: you want some SERIOUS transformation?
Reservoir_Dog wrote:I wonder who Microsoft is going to put into the White House.
we won't know until they sit down and discuss it with DuPont, IBM and Goldman-Sachs. I'm sure whoever they back will have the best interests of the working man at heart, right? It's like we can't possibly lose. Thank you, Repubs, for giving us Alito, Thomas and Roberts. The next conservative nitwit I hear ramble on about activist judges might want to ponder this decision, which might well be the most far-reaching legal precedent the court has given in decades. This is a prime case of an issue that goes far beyond liberal or conservative. Similar to the recent decisions on property rights, this one strikes at the foundations of what our founders tried to establish: a nation which values private property, free speech for individuals, and was leery of corporations(private holding companies in the 18th century) that use power and influence to screw the citizenry.
Re: you want some SERIOUS transformation?
What that does not happen alreadycallmeslick wrote:Reservoir_Dog wrote:I wonder who Microsoft is going to put into the White House.
we won't know until they sit down and discuss it with DuPont, IBM and Goldman-Sachs. I'm sure whoever they back will have the best interests of the working man at heart, right? It's like we can't possibly lose.
Re: you want some SERIOUS transformation?
Well...with all the hand-outs and bail outs...I guess the Supreme Court is gonna let let the Dem's whore themselves out to win the next election?....again...
Old Pudfark sez: " Same Shit...Different Day "
Old Pudfark sez: " Same Shit...Different Day "
Re: you want some SERIOUS transformation?
That's true. Look at how ACORN is allowed to do whatever they want cuz they gave Barry a few duckets. I think it's a good thing, let's just force this corruption down people's throats until they truly get fed up. Cuz up until the asswhoopin in Mass the voters were sheeple. They still may be.fatman wrote: What that does not happen already
I love how the DNC fagboys here are bitching about this but didn't complain once about eminent domain being bitch slapped by their court nominees.
Re: you want some SERIOUS transformation?
Now we all know that the Supreme Court is as corrupt as the other two branches....
Well, I guess it's time fer some Tea Parties on the "Justice's" front porch...
Old Pudfark sez: " Time for a picnic? "
Well, I guess it's time fer some Tea Parties on the "Justice's" front porch...
Old Pudfark sez: " Time for a picnic? "
Re: you want some SERIOUS transformation?
Nothing to see here... goldman sachs gives to both parties anyway
Re: you want some SERIOUS transformation?
Now? You obviously missed the presidential election 10 years ago.Pudfark wrote:Now we all know that the Supreme Court is as corrupt as the other two branches....
Re: you want some SERIOUS transformation?
There's no proof of that except for a few Florida Dems saying that the ballots were too hard to read. I guess the old folks who had been voting for 60 odd years completely forgot how to 1) read 2) vote with the punch card.GOYA wrote:
Now? You obviously missed the presidential election 10 years ago.