you may like this then..certainly looks like one of the operators is having funcallmeslick wrote:Buzz, my dad served as well......developing fire suppressent chemicals

who gets the cee-gar for guessing the poor fire training victim in last photo?






you may like this then..certainly looks like one of the operators is having funcallmeslick wrote:Buzz, my dad served as well......developing fire suppressent chemicals
Really? I don't have to look too far to prove you're wrong.Daiichidoku wrote:Buzz- the germans NEVER complained they were beat by superior eq, they fully realise they were beat (for the most part) by logistics and bad management, if you were to grossly oversimplify it.
i did, perhaps you misread?Buzz wrote:Really? I don't have to look too far to prove you're wrong.Daiichidoku wrote:Buzz- the germans NEVER complained they were beat by superior eq, they fully realise they were beat (for the most part) by logistics and bad management, if you were to grossly oversimplify it.
Read Juha's post in this thread. I've been reading comments like those for years.
callmeslick wrote:Daii- Great picsDude, you are a posting machine today!!
My dad has some funny stories around that whole thing. Short and sweet: he was an engineering student at UVA and due to nationwide war effort, got put on a fast track and got a degree in 3 years. Went to work in DC, got made an Ensign in the Navy overnight, essentially. The job consisted of concocting stuff in the labs and then going out on fire tugs into the Potomac and trying to put out fires on flaming barges. Some of the stuff was completely counterproductive and produced even more massive blazes. Eventually, they got the stuff down right, it went off to the Pacific Fleet and prevented airplane fuel fires from completely disabling carriers at sea(a big problem in the day, we didn't have all that many and they were crucial against Japan).
Bottom line, if you really are compelled to go to war(and more often than not, you aren't, IMO), that was the way to do it, a nationwide effort from every citizen, at every level of society. And, sacrifice by all. Look back at the shortcomings from Vietnam to present and that level of cohesiveness might be high on the list of reasons why we have tended to fall short of victory.
No kidding. What do you think i've been talking about all this time?Daiichidoku wrote:i did, perhaps you misread?Buzz wrote:Really? I don't have to look too far to prove you're wrong.Daiichidoku wrote:Buzz- the germans NEVER complained they were beat by superior eq, they fully realise they were beat (for the most part) by logistics and bad management, if you were to grossly oversimplify it.
Read Juha's post in this thread. I've been reading comments like those for years.
Juha stated "It was quantity over quality that won teh war!"
safe to say he referred to the Germans having the quality eq, and the arrayed forces of US/Britain?USSR having the quantity that won the war?
its the funneh, two paths, same destination;Pudfark wrote:drivel
thats valid, lotsa tards like pud drink the kool aid, sure many Germans are all rah-rah stupid alsoBuzz wrote:The problem I have is they think that's the only way we could have won.
Heads up. Everything equal. We still win.