HappyHappy wrote:And the Democratic party is the slave party.
No you say?
If the Democratic party had won in 1864 we would not have a United States as we now know it.
The South would have had slaves for many more years.
Laugh ae the Tea Perty if you like, you a member of the party that supported SLAVERY.
Callmesick, you are a pathetic joke.
HH
actually, you are right about the slavery bit. That is why my original leanings were Republican. That all changed on or around 1980, when the loons started to hijack the GOP. By now, the takeover is pretty much complete, and what was the party of fiscal responsibility(NOT the same as no taxes, no government), very cautious foreign policy and complete non-involvement in religion and personal matters has turned completely on it's head. Sad, actually. By the way, a Republican was the first true Progressive on the national scene,
and Republicans were the first to embrace environmental activism. You see, HH, Democrat and Republican are just party names, the philosophies are anything but constant over the course of times.
Bottom line is still this: Bachmann is an idiot, a complete clueless moron. Sort of like you, HH, but I would think that even you might understand how truly stupid it is to campaign in New Hampshire and confuse the state with it's neighbor to the south.....especially for a Republican.