for Ruggie's edification

Post Reply
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

for Ruggie's edification

Post by callmeslick »

.....read it and weep, pal. Read especially closely the analysis about 2012 in Arizona.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42236057/ns ... sion_2012/
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
User avatar
Buzz
Posts: 2240
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:37 pm
Location: Colorado

Re: for Ruggie's edification

Post by Buzz »

Soon it will be Mexzona.
ruggbutt
Posts: 2147
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:11 am

Re: for Ruggie's edification

Post by ruggbutt »

Sheriff Joe will continue to deport the illegals so I don't give a shit. As long as they are in the country legally I have no issues at all.
Image
All the cool LOMAC stuff
Reservoir_Dog wrote:It's been a long time since she's cum
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: for Ruggie's edification

Post by callmeslick »

a little more demographic change and the hispanics will be 'deporting' Sheriff Joe. Especially, if he decides
to run for Senate.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
User avatar
Darkhorse
Posts: 555
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 12:32 am

Re: for Ruggie's edification

Post by Darkhorse »

Slick there are two groups of Hispanics included in the numbers that you are counting that will not vote the way you think they should. The problem with you and the writer of the MSN piece is you don't have a clue about the American Southwest and the Hispanic population that lives here. Don't get your hopes up!
Now we have demonstrable evidence that if you try to lead from behind, eventually the guys up front will stop looking back for instructions.
Government-coerced expression is a feature of dictatorships that has no place in a free country
Pudfark

Re: for Ruggie's edification

Post by Pudfark »

Darkhorse wrote: Don't get your hopes up!
As in?
Last November... ;)
ruggbutt
Posts: 2147
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:11 am

Re: for Ruggie's edification

Post by ruggbutt »

Darkhorse wrote: The problem with you and the writer of the MSN piece is you don't have a clue about the American Southwest and the Hispanic population that lives here. Don't get your hopes up!
You're speaking to the guy who thinks he knows it all. I didn't want to spend time educating him that those that are here legally and can lawfully vote don't typically like the illegals. They think it makes all hispanics look bad.
Image
All the cool LOMAC stuff
Reservoir_Dog wrote:It's been a long time since she's cum
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: for Ruggie's edification

Post by callmeslick »

Darkhorse wrote:Slick there are two groups of Hispanics included in the numbers that you are counting that will not vote the way you think they should. The problem with you and the writer of the MSN piece is you don't have a clue about the American Southwest and the Hispanic population that lives here. Don't get your hopes up!
so, the fact that California, which long was a tossup/bellweather state, has turned solidly Democratic is meaningless? Or,the effect of the Hispanic population increase on Democratic party advances in Colorado and Nevada doesn't fall into 'the Southwest'? It isn't about my hopes, it's the realization that the GOP has pissed away a golden opportunity(via, ironically, the Bush family), and will pay for years. Other, more easterly examples: North Carolina and Florida, which have moved from solid GOP to tossups.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
Post Reply