Did you guys see that piece?
Re: Did you guys see that piece?
May be obvious to a Frenchman, but it doesn't appear to be obvious to many Americans.
-
Pudfark
Re: Did you guys see that piece?
Here's some obvious Nic...I'm sure you are aware of this?
Soros Loses Bid to Overturn Insider Trading Conviction
George Soros, the billionaire financier and liberal activist, was dealt a legal blow this week when the European Court of Human Rights refused to overturn his nine-year-old criminal conviction for insider trading.
A French court convicted Soros in 2002 for insider trading in the late 1980s, but the Hungary-born investor appealed, arguing that the French law on insider trading at the time was too ambiguous to find him guilty.
But the European court ruled Thursday in a 4-3 decision that the French rules were clear enough to convict him.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/10 ... z1a7Sq06CZ
Soros Loses Bid to Overturn Insider Trading Conviction
George Soros, the billionaire financier and liberal activist, was dealt a legal blow this week when the European Court of Human Rights refused to overturn his nine-year-old criminal conviction for insider trading.
A French court convicted Soros in 2002 for insider trading in the late 1980s, but the Hungary-born investor appealed, arguing that the French law on insider trading at the time was too ambiguous to find him guilty.
But the European court ruled Thursday in a 4-3 decision that the French rules were clear enough to convict him.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/10 ... z1a7Sq06CZ
-
HappyHappy
Re: Did you guys see that piece?
The only conspiracy on Sept 11 2001 was amongst the terrorists.
Not even a whack job French idiot can convince me otherwise.
The educated people that claim it was a Bush administration conspiracy
simply hate Bush, hate Republicans or are in it for the money.
More likely all the above.
There is money to be made in bogus conspiracy claims and books.
Facts never stand in the way of the chance at big $$$$$$
Heck they are still trying to say someone other than
Oswald shot JFK! Yet there is no evidence at all for that.
Oh by the way, I will always feel someone helped push Oswald's
buttons, that is also a conspiracy in it's own right.
HH
Not even a whack job French idiot can convince me otherwise.
The educated people that claim it was a Bush administration conspiracy
simply hate Bush, hate Republicans or are in it for the money.
More likely all the above.
There is money to be made in bogus conspiracy claims and books.
Facts never stand in the way of the chance at big $$$$$$
Heck they are still trying to say someone other than
Oswald shot JFK! Yet there is no evidence at all for that.
Oh by the way, I will always feel someone helped push Oswald's
buttons, that is also a conspiracy in it's own right.
HH
Re: Did you guys see that piece?
Indeed JFK was killed because he pissed some people off, and it was someone from within.
Nic
Nic
-
callmeslick
- Posts: 16473
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
- Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
Re: Did you guys see that piece?
nicolas10 wrote:Indeed JFK was killed because he pissed some people off, and it was someone from within.
Nic
when the Mob gets you elected, and then you start an FBI investigation of the Mob, bad things happen.
Just sayin'
-
HappyHappy
Re: Did you guys see that piece?
The mob connection is why I can never discount
the chance that Oswald's buttons were pushed.
But Oswald it was.
It was an easy shot at close range
with a scoped rifle.
The only issue I see is the rate of fire seems high
for a bolt action rifle.
I can easily lay 5 shots into a target the size of a human head
inside of 5 seconds with a similar rifle. Reson is
I am left handed. Oswald also fired with his left. I believe he was a lefty.
A lefty can keep his hand in the firing position and never lose
his target (through the scope). yes recoil means it bounces.
But you can cycle the bolt with the right while you re-aquire the target.
With a Sweedish M38 bolt action in 6.5x55 (a lot more powerful than the 6.5 itallian)
I did it with ease staying within the 8 ring on a 100 yard target resting
on the same thing Oswald used, cardboard boxes. At 100 yards!
At 50 to 65 yards it's like shooting fish in a barrel.
I am amazed he missed at all!
HH
the chance that Oswald's buttons were pushed.
But Oswald it was.
It was an easy shot at close range
with a scoped rifle.
The only issue I see is the rate of fire seems high
for a bolt action rifle.
I can easily lay 5 shots into a target the size of a human head
inside of 5 seconds with a similar rifle. Reson is
I am left handed. Oswald also fired with his left. I believe he was a lefty.
A lefty can keep his hand in the firing position and never lose
his target (through the scope). yes recoil means it bounces.
But you can cycle the bolt with the right while you re-aquire the target.
With a Sweedish M38 bolt action in 6.5x55 (a lot more powerful than the 6.5 itallian)
I did it with ease staying within the 8 ring on a 100 yard target resting
on the same thing Oswald used, cardboard boxes. At 100 yards!
At 50 to 65 yards it's like shooting fish in a barrel.
I am amazed he missed at all!
HH
-
Pudfark
Re: Did you guys see that piece?
No offense HH...but that there esplanation is getting a tad tiresome....
It makes no sense what so ever...to use a carcano carbine for that task...
Hell, a .22 rimfire semi-auto would have got the job done easier and faster...
Not to mention a .30 carbine...Garand...and a host of others....
The carcano was a "plant"...pure and simple... ballistics and all.
It makes no sense what so ever...to use a carcano carbine for that task...
Hell, a .22 rimfire semi-auto would have got the job done easier and faster...
Not to mention a .30 carbine...Garand...and a host of others....
The carcano was a "plant"...pure and simple... ballistics and all.
-
Pudfark
Re: Did you guys see that piece?
Most likely...nicolas10 wrote:Indeed JFK was killed because he pissed some people off, and it was someone from within.
Nic