Getting the "story" straight....

Pudfark

Re: Getting the "story" straight....

Post by Pudfark »

nicolas10 wrote:WTF would I know, I carefully avoid any newschannel.

Nic
Ah, well ok..."The Ostrich Syndrome"...generally followed by the "Stockholm Syndrome".... :roll:
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: Getting the "story" straight....

Post by callmeslick »

the troops? Went 55-45 for Obama in 2008, and likely more like 60-40 this time around.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
Pudfark

Re: Getting the "story" straight....

Post by Pudfark »

Really? Were all their "votes" counted? :roll:
Barfly
Posts: 686
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:33 pm

Re: Getting the "story" straight....

Post by Barfly »

callmeslick wrote:the troops? Went 55-45 for Obama in 2008, and likely more like 60-40 this time around.
Most data shows the vast majority supported McCain. Most, you cherry picker.

If the majority of the military would vote Obama in 12, why would the Obama campaign sue the state of Ohio to try to prevent military members from voting early

http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/Ohio-mi ... /id/447552

It' s because they are trying to limit the vote from a largely Republican voter block. See how this works Slick?
User avatar
Reservoir_Dog
Posts: 8858
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.

Re: Getting the "story" straight....

Post by Reservoir_Dog »

Pudfark wrote:Really? Were all their "votes" counted? :roll:
What in God's name are trying to imply?
This, I can't wait to hear.
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: Getting the "story" straight....

Post by callmeslick »

Barfly wrote:
callmeslick wrote:the troops? Went 55-45 for Obama in 2008, and likely more like 60-40 this time around.
Most data shows the vast majority supported McCain. Most, you cherry picker.

If the majority of the military would vote Obama in 12, why would the Obama campaign sue the state of Ohio to try to prevent military members from voting early

http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/Ohio-mi ... /id/447552

It' s because they are trying to limit the vote from a largely Republican voter block. See how this works Slick?

from the American Conservative:
" — in fact, men and women serving abroad gave Obama nearly six times more than his opponent,"

and, the articles debunking Romney's claim about military vote supression in Ohio are numerous. Most call it an outright lie. The suit merely demands that ALL citizens of Ohio retain the early voting priviliges they gained since 2004. The GOP had sought to selectively curtail some people's early vote(specifically in cities....full of, GASP, black voters)
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
User avatar
nicolas10
Posts: 1847
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 8:26 pm

Re: Getting the "story" straight....

Post by nicolas10 »

Pudfark wrote:
nicolas10 wrote:WTF would I know, I carefully avoid any newschannel.

Nic
Ah, well ok..."The Ostrich Syndrome"...generally followed by the "Stockholm Syndrome".... :roll:
Have you ever heard of the "blow me" syndrome?

Nic
Image
Barfly
Posts: 686
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:33 pm

Re: Getting the "story" straight....

Post by Barfly »

callmeslick wrote:
Barfly wrote:
callmeslick wrote:the troops? Went 55-45 for Obama in 2008, and likely more like 60-40 this time around.
Most data shows the vast majority supported McCain. Most, you cherry picker.

If the majority of the military would vote Obama in 12, why would the Obama campaign sue the state of Ohio to try to prevent military members from voting early

http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/Ohio-mi ... /id/447552

It' s because they are trying to limit the vote from a largely Republican voter block. See how this works Slick?

from the American Conservative:
" — in fact, men and women serving abroad gave Obama nearly six times more than his opponent,"

and, the articles debunking Romney's claim about military vote supression in Ohio are numerous. Most call it an outright lie. The suit merely demands that ALL citizens of Ohio retain the early voting priviliges they gained since 2004. The GOP had sought to selectively curtail some people's early vote(specifically in cities....full of, GASP, black voters)
Demanding that all citizens are on the same voting timeline eliminates the early military vote, see? Accusing the GOP of doing same is an attempt to divert attention from real efforts to manipulate the vote.
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: Getting the "story" straight....

Post by callmeslick »

do you get it, Barfly? (obviously not, see comment re:grey matter) The GOP, several months ago, attempted to SELECTIVELY limit early voting, but wrote in a section about remaining open for vets(residents, not absentee voters). Thus, it was the GOP who wanted to curtail access to the polls. The Obama suit merely seeks to clarify that if the ban applies to any citizen it applies to ALL citizens. As citizens, military personnel are NO DIFFERENT than any other voter. No one should get a special break.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
Barfly
Posts: 686
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:33 pm

Re: Getting the "story" straight....

Post by Barfly »

So the tradition of allowing overseas military personel to vote absentee ballot early, and postage free, to ensure they can vote and get it in early enough to be counted should be eliminated? Algore tried to do that in Florida.

And WTF do you know about military service? Drop some more acid, ya old hippy.
Post Reply