Seriously this election is just like the one we have in france. Do you rather have your right hand cut off or your left hand.
I don't understand why people bother going voting.
Nic
Last Debate goes to Romney
Re: Last Debate goes to Romney
Don't make accusations you can't back up. I watched every second of all 4 debates, and the reruns.CUDA wrote:you made the accusation burden is yours, you cannot make a vague blanket statement and not back it up. nice try thoughBuzz wrote:I'm packing for my hunt that starts tomorrow. I don't have time to do something you can't do.
YA that's what I thought. you have no clue what I'm talking about. didn't watch the debate either did you??? way to go HH Jr.Here's one small example of Romney's arrogance. There's so many more. He has no respect for the president. He's only trying to be president. Obama is the president.
I'm guessing you think it's unconstitutional for him to question the President too don't you? is your real name Chris Matthews???? you really should stop watching MSNBC Buzz.
an FYI Respect goes both ways. the President has showed None to Romney either. it's called politics![]()
I know you spend way too much time with the Donkey's and the Bears but that "example" you gave isn't even close to what Obama said. and FYI arrogance and ridicule are not the same thing. just FYIMITT ROMNEY: I don’t think anyone really believes that you’re a person who’s going to be pushing for oil and gas and coal. You’ll get your chance in a moment. I’m still speaking.
BARACK OBAMA: Well, Governor, if you’re asking a question–
ROMNEY: That wasn’t a question. That was a statement.
I said it was just one example. Those are quotes, so that is what he said, although Romney was talking over the top of Obama, so it was hard to get it all. Romney loves doing that, because he's special.
Why should Romney get any respect? He's a damn liar, and changes his mind everyday. He hasn't earned any respect.
Don't be so touchy just because your guy is going to lose.
-
CUDA
- Posts: 1384
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:23 pm
- Location: The lone Conservative voice in the Liberal Bastion of Portland Oregon
Re: Last Debate goes to Romney
Bullshit Buzz. you have no clue what Obama said do you??? you've so danced around the issue and made shit up that it's actually embarrassing
so I guess you can go play with your little Bears that live in the woods, slinking around in the underbrush with the little thing that's called a Gun.
so I guess you can go play with your little Bears that live in the woods, slinking around in the underbrush with the little thing that's called a Gun.
"In reality, there exists only fact and fiction.
Opinions result from a lack of the former and a reliance on the latter."

Opinions result from a lack of the former and a reliance on the latter."

- callmeslick
- Posts: 16473
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
- Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
Re: Last Debate goes to Romney
touchy, touchy, touchy.....CUDA, the facts are the facts. Both men might stretch the truth like most all politicos, but Romney might be the first Presidential candidate I can ever remember who changed positions wholesale over a matter of a few weeks. Either he is a big-time liar, or(as I suspect) has utterly NO convictions at all. The latter is actually worse, as I pointed out elsewhere, as it means he is for sale to those that paid for his election and at the mercy of his 'advisors'. Heaven help us all.
-
CUDA
- Posts: 1384
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:23 pm
- Location: The lone Conservative voice in the Liberal Bastion of Portland Oregon
Re: Last Debate goes to Romney
THANK YOU for making my point for me. so when the President said this to Gov Romneycallmeslick wrote:touchy, touchy, touchy.....CUDA,
We have these things called aircraft carriers, where planes land on them.
'We have these ships that go underwater, nuclear submarines. And so the question is not a game of Battleship, where we're counting ships.'
it was mocking. and it was beneath the office to do so. at no time during those debates did Romney do anything like that to the President. he has questioned him hard. asked tough questions and demanded answers. and at times not backed down and talked over him. but at no time during those debates did he mock him. and thinking that the President is above questioning (Buzz) is so Nixonesque.
Remember those words?????? apparently the man that spoke them does not. because that's EXACTLY what he's done during this election. because his record sucks.If you don't have a record to run on, then you paint your opponent as someone people should run from. You make a big election about small things.
slick wrote: Either he is a big-time liar, or(as I suspect) has utterly NO convictions at all. The latter is actually worse, as I pointed out elsewhere, as it means he is for sale to those that paid for his election and at the mercy of his 'advisors'. Heaven help us all.
LOL one word "BENGHAZI" so who's the liar. Nixon was run out of office for covering up Watergate. Watergate was nothing. it was a low level break-in that meant nothing. it was his covering it up that screwed him. Benghazi cost 4 lives, Inckuding that of an Ambassador. the President botched it and is now trying to cover it up. Benghazi is Watergate on steroids. "IF" there is no Benghazigate then why did the consulate send emails to the state department the day of the attack linking it to terrorism. and then for the next 2 weeks why did the President, the White house AND State Department blame it on a Video. if they were not sure what the cause was they should not have said it was because of a video. they should have said we don't know but we'll find out. but instead they went out multiple times and said it was because of a Video. the President himself stood before the UN and said it was about a Video, and then later comes out and say YES it was terrorism. a FACT that they knew 2+ weeks prior while it was happening. they know that the consulate was under attack at 4PM local, because the Email from the consulate said so.we know that those emails made it to the situation room at the Whitehouse where the President} VP and the chief of staff were having a meeting just 1 hour later at 5pm. we know the attack went on for 7 hours. we know they had troops in Italy only 1 hour away, only 400 miles. and yet they didn't do anything?? WHY???? either they are inept, incompetent, or they are covering something up. which is it????Buzz wrote:Why should Romney get any respect? He's a damn liar,
yes they are. and the fact is the President knowingly liedslick wrote:the facts are the facts.
Last edited by CUDA on Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
"In reality, there exists only fact and fiction.
Opinions result from a lack of the former and a reliance on the latter."

Opinions result from a lack of the former and a reliance on the latter."

- callmeslick
- Posts: 16473
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
- Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
Re: Last Debate goes to Romney
on the Benghazi matter, did it ever occur to anyone that they might not have wanted to lay out every detail or fact they knew, so as to better pursue the perpetrators in this modern hi-speed communication era? I suspect, that when the whole thing is seen in history, that will be the case.
-
CUDA
- Posts: 1384
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:23 pm
- Location: The lone Conservative voice in the Liberal Bastion of Portland Oregon
Re: Last Debate goes to Romney
then why claim it was about a Video. why not just say we dont know but we'll find out. nice try but fail
"In reality, there exists only fact and fiction.
Opinions result from a lack of the former and a reliance on the latter."

Opinions result from a lack of the former and a reliance on the latter."

- callmeslick
- Posts: 16473
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
- Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
Re: Last Debate goes to Romney
We'll have to see, CUDA, but I smell disinformation, not for the purpose of politics, but to cover for CIA investigation.
Now, back to the subject of ol' Lying Mitt.....turns out that he doesn't just lie to us, to get elected. No, he lies to a court, under oath perhaps:
http://www.cnbc.com/id/49546553
Now, back to the subject of ol' Lying Mitt.....turns out that he doesn't just lie to us, to get elected. No, he lies to a court, under oath perhaps:
http://www.cnbc.com/id/49546553
-
CUDA
- Posts: 1384
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:23 pm
- Location: The lone Conservative voice in the Liberal Bastion of Portland Oregon
Re: Last Debate goes to Romney
WRONG... the President knew in real time time of the attacks, and that it was terrorism. he lied to the people. FOR 2+ WEEKS. then he went to the UN and Lied to the entire world about it. Biden Lied to the American people, when during the debate he said that he and the President didn't know. we have facts that they did know. IN REAL TIME. and now he has Hillary lying to the people also to cover his ass. Patheticcallmeslick wrote:We'll have to see, CUDA, but I smell disinformation, not for the purpose of politics, but to cover for CIA investigation.
Slick I've always considered you a man of reasonable intelligence. while i disagree with your politics you are not stupid. stop letting the lure of power and keeping your man in office corrupt your judgement. you KNOW the President and the administration are lying about this and trying to cover it up. man up and admit it. you cannot call one man a liar and not admit a blatant lie from the other. that in and of itself is deception (a lie) on your part.
"In reality, there exists only fact and fiction.
Opinions result from a lack of the former and a reliance on the latter."

Opinions result from a lack of the former and a reliance on the latter."

Re: Last Debate goes to Romney
What occurred to me was this administration sucks when it comes to anti-terrorism!callmeslick wrote:on the Benghazi matter, did it ever occur to anyone that they might not have wanted to lay out every detail or fact they knew, so as to better pursue the perpetrators in this modern hi-speed communication era? I suspect, that when the whole thing is seen in history, that will be the case.
Now we have demonstrable evidence that if you try to lead from behind, eventually the guys up front will stop looking back for instructions.
Government-coerced expression is a feature of dictatorships that has no place in a free country
Government-coerced expression is a feature of dictatorships that has no place in a free country
