Wrong again.
It's about saving lives....more would be saved my way.
Hell, you can extrapolate it in any direction you want....no booze, no cigars, no candy?
Everybody is upset about this incident....That does not except/accept you or me from applying common sense. What you have "over looked"? There is no solution to that type of problem. Regulation won't fix it. Vigilance might could? A little. Nobody can reasonably guarantee your safety, but you. You advocate removing yourself from the solution and passing on that responsibility to other unknown persons. As a former "other person", I can honestly tell you this? 99% of the time, because of circumstances beyond my scope or sphere of infuence/control...I was always late, getting there. When math was attempted to resolve that time lag? There was 1 of me for 40,000 of ewe. That's just how it was...and how it still is. The FBI did a study years ago..they said the proper ratio was 1 to 15000....I don't know how you feel about this...To me? It's like packing yer pipe with a turd and smoking in the elevator.
If you possess the ability to personally protect you and yours...and you give it up, for any reason or circumstance....you are a fool. If you think the Calvary is coming to rescue you and yours...You are mistaken. They will arrive in time to take the pictures and write the report. What they report or photo? Is solely up to you.
A vehicle is as deadly as gun. Matter of fact...more folks die in or from vehicles. Many of the vehicle owners/drivers own guns. When ya consider the environmental, health and energy concerns....which one, gun or car? Would more regulation, benefit?