callmeslick wrote:Barfly, if you don't see this parents' behavior as ridiculous, shame on you. Beyond that, no sense responding to childish personal attacks, so I won't.
You started off with one, and are ending with one. Can't stand the heat eh? You never played sports as a child did you...
Heat? Like, "in heat"? Geez, dude, you've turned into a pathetic little lap dog nipping at my heels. Come little doggy! Good doggy! Roll over.
Try to state a real point of view, a real thought, and quit obsessing on my political point of view. What's up, still sore about the election outcome?
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am
I live in Texas....you live in America.
Presenting a political point was the whole purpose of you starting this thread wasn't it? That a parent was being ridiculous because he was outraged that a school would implement some new age ideas that you espouse.
Barfly wrote:Presenting a political point was the whole purpose of you starting this thread wasn't it? That a parent was being ridiculous because he was outraged that a school would implement some new age ideas that you espouse.
what 'new age' ideas are reflected in 5 year olds reciting the Pledge of Allegiance imperfectly? That's all there was, there. Hell, at that age, the ideal is to have a kid able to handle sentences with two-syllable words well. No shock that 'liberty' and especially 'indivisible' probably foul them up.
Now,now, CUDA.....that was politically incorrect!
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am
I live in Texas....you live in America.
It's too late to join the race such as it is RD, at the gunshot, Pud went off to the armory, and Slick ran screaming, waving his arms, into the bleachers.
The substance is, you tried to make a point that people should let progressive doctrination of young children occur, and not complain about it. I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt that you even understood the article you linked; maybe you didn't.