"We haven't played that card yet"
Don't be telling folks about it...if'n ya aint seen it...we deny it.
We reserve the "right" to play that card later...if we have it...which we deny.
"So, bad on you...throw some more money in the pot...I gotta "gin" up some more kids to do that"
And if you keep this up..."I'll have some poor people standing there next time."
Maybe some meskins too.
Go right ahead, Slick it ain't gonna preclude a fight, even hiding behind kids.
well, watch, Pud, and see if the following scenario doesn't take place:
1. Senate passes much, but not all, of the President's proposed law changes
2. House moderate Republicans force the bill to a floor vote(see how the Sandy relief bill got voted on for reference)
3. House passes Senate bill with minimal GOP votes(maybe 45-55 in favor)
4. President signs new laws
5. Next election campaign, any candidate NOT from a Deep Red district who voted against gets killed at the polls.
time will tell if I'm right, but it seems that the moderate wing of the GOP has recently found their collective testicles, and their holding Boehner's to the fire.
I suspect there is a very private, but very real threat of caucus with the Dems if commonsense stuff isn't brought to the floor. This will affect not only gun legislation, but debt ceiling and other measures around job growth. These boys,if nothing else, can read polls. And, on the gun issue, 85% of the electorate believes in mandatory background check for all sales, 76% want to see magazine restrictions and about the same want background checks for ammo purchase. The assault weapon ban has around 56% support. Obama will mobilize his troops and negate any NRA push. Further, the NRA and others are steadily weakening their case with the general public with hysteria and outright goofiness. As I said, as a responsible gun owner, you can choose to support the stupidity and hysteria, or act rational. Your call.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am
I live in Texas....you live in America.
get your eyes checked, Pud, Obama was standing in front of the kids. I mean, there's video and all......
get over the Obama hate, the guy's doing just fine, and Joe is setting himself up for his 2016 run, it's starting to appear. I'll likely know for sure when I return from DC next Tuesday, I'm waiting for the money pitch, although after paying for this weekend, I'm going to be stingy for a bit.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am
I live in Texas....you live in America.
Oh...I don't hate Obama. I just know who and what he is.
I recognize his "tools" as well.
So do you...if, not, try a mirror.
Lowering yourself to being "naively cute" works for Honey boo-boo.
If you want to wear her dress? Suit yerself.
I just find it amusing...on you.
Though, you might give some thought to?
Fella's who wear a dress...have no real complaint?
If they get "poked" some.
Give this some thought?
The Second Amendment exists for those "occasions"?
When the Peoples Sword, must be mightier than the Governments Pen.
That's the way smarter folks wrote it and that's what they meant/intended.
You and Yours ain't smart enough to "change" it.
Hiding behind children, won't get the job done for you.
Particularly, when your argument is "protecting" children.
We all want to protect the children.
To do that?
You have to protect the children where they are.
Not where they ain't.
Shame on You and Yours.
Your collective stupidity is as dangerous to them as any mental case.
callmeslick wrote:the sore loser is showing through, it would seem. Me and mine? Shame on us? Hardly, I am proud of what we've accomplishedand look forward to more.
Me too, which is a nothing.
Which is what I been writing about and you been "Honey boo-booing"
Go right ahead, Slick it ain't gonna preclude a fight, even hiding behind kids.
