Well Lance...........

User avatar
Buzz
Posts: 2240
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:37 pm
Location: Colorado

Re: Well Lance...........

Post by Buzz »

Soap.......I guess you don't watch football? The real football, and your version.

Lots of steroids.

How is it cheating if all the riders were doing the same thing as Lance? Cheating means gaining an advantage. What advantage did he have?
Pudfark

Re: Well Lance...........

Post by Pudfark »

Buzz....maybe just enough to win 7 times.
It ain't the fact that "everybody" cheated and
that's makes it ok. Wrong is just plain wrong.
User avatar
Reservoir_Dog
Posts: 8858
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.

Re: Well Lance...........

Post by Reservoir_Dog »

Let me get this straight .....

Buzz is defending Lance Armstrong ...... but thinks the cop that shot that elk is an asshole!

:roll:
User avatar
Buzz
Posts: 2240
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:37 pm
Location: Colorado

Re: Well Lance...........

Post by Buzz »

I'm not defending what he did. I'm just saying if everybody was clean including Lance. He would have still won.

RD..You're really not very smart. How can you get so many things wrong?

The fork was a real winner.
Pudfark

Re: Well Lance...........

Post by Pudfark »

The fork made a point.
User avatar
nicolas10
Posts: 1847
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 8:26 pm

Re: Well Lance...........

Post by nicolas10 »

Buzz wrote:On his comeback he used no doping...
RRrrrrrrrriiiiiiight.

Nic
Image
User avatar
Reservoir_Dog
Posts: 8858
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.

Re: Well Lance...........

Post by Reservoir_Dog »

Buzz wrote:The fork was a real winner.
Pudfark wrote:The fork made a point.
The fork is, and always has been, an epic fail.
Because you don't understand the fork. And you never will.
Pudfark

Re: Well Lance...........

Post by Pudfark »

I see yer point, R_D.

Some folks can "handle a fork".

Some folks insist on the right to be "spoon fed".
Enjoy yer soup. ;)
User avatar
Buzz
Posts: 2240
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:37 pm
Location: Colorado

Re: Well Lance...........

Post by Buzz »

nicolas10 wrote:
Buzz wrote:On his comeback he used no doping...
RRrrrrrrrriiiiiiight.

Nic
Everybody agrees with that. No positive tests, and even his teammates that accused him of his wins were doped agrees he didn't dope in his comeback.

You could see it. He had no recovery.
User avatar
Buzz
Posts: 2240
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:37 pm
Location: Colorado

Re: Well Lance...........

Post by Buzz »

Reservoir_Dog wrote:
Buzz wrote:The fork was a real winner.
Pudfark wrote:The fork made a point.
The fork is, and always has been, an epic fail.
Because you don't understand the fork. And you never will.
No, you don't. You can't blame the gun for the tragedy's no more that you can blame the fork for people getting fat.

It's not hard to understand unless you're one of those who's for gun bans?
Post Reply