Condi looks Presidential...

User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: Condi looks Presidential...

Post by callmeslick »

oh, you mean this?http://www.snopes.com/rumors/north.asp
read it and weep, Pud......you've made an ass of yourself again! Attaboy, twice in one day. Keep it up and go for the trifecta. Or, just hit the bar and call it a night. Either way, we still love ya! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Last edited by callmeslick on Sun Feb 10, 2013 9:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
Pudfark

Re: Condi looks Presidential...

Post by Pudfark »

"Consequently, North's convictions were reversed. The Supreme Court declined to review the case. After further hearings on the immunity issue, Judge Gesell dismissed all charges against North on September 16, 1991, on the motion of the independent counsel." :o

By the way...dummy it's in yer snopes link. :roll:
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: Condi looks Presidential...

Post by callmeslick »

I knew his conviction was overturned, but he was still convicted.....and you were still spouting BS you never bothered to check on for accuracy.
Attaboy!! :lol:
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
Pudfark

Re: Condi looks Presidential...

Post by Pudfark »

You are just pathetic...North wasn't even charged when he was talking about the danger of Bin Laden. Dipshit.

You knew it was overturned and yet you still referred to him as "convicted".
Now, you're claiming it's a technicality, cuz yer caught again.

Running off at the mouth and deliberately being disingenuous seems to suit you. :roll:
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: Condi looks Presidential...

Post by callmeslick »

Pudfark wrote:You are just pathetic...North wasn't even charged when he was talking about the danger of Bin Laden. Dipshit.
no, he'd already been convicted and had it overturned. The crime occured in the 1980s. Plus, as Snopes shows,he never did shit to warn about AlQueda.
Which was, if you recall, your entire goofy assertion. Piece of advice: Maybe you want to focus less on 'gotcha' moments and actually fact check the assertions you make here, because folks will check out stuff. Especially when the poster has the piss-poor track record you've established. Just sayin'....
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
Pudfark

Re: Condi looks Presidential...

Post by Pudfark »

Here's why I called you a Dipshit.....Dipshit.
One of the reasons Ollie was indicted was over a "security system/fence".
When asked why he felt he needed it?
He said because Bin Laden is the most dangerous terrorist in the world.
Ollie spoke to it before he was indicted, tried and the verdict overturned.
Dipshit.
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: Condi looks Presidential...

Post by callmeslick »

Two words to look up: Iran Contra :roll:
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
Pudfark

Re: Condi looks Presidential...

Post by Pudfark »

callmeslick wrote:Two words to look up: Iran Contra :roll:
Not germane to this discussion. Feeble effort on your part.
You are capable, used to be, of better than that. Just another,
of your disingenuous tactics...when you're caught, again.
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: Condi looks Presidential...

Post by callmeslick »

God, you're stupid....that is precisely what got North convicted.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
Pudfark

Re: Condi looks Presidential...

Post by Pudfark »

callmeslick wrote:God, you're stupid....that is precisely what got North convicted.
:lol: That has nothing to do with this discussion. Is North convicted now?
Was North convicted when he spoke of the danger of Bin Laden?
Are you going to be perpetually stupid in this thread?

Did North at one time "stand" convicted? Well, yeah, briefly. Why was it overturned?
Go re-read the link you posted....dummy. Then google a bit more.
Maybe for a change (big one) go find the truth, instead of making it up.
Thanx.
Post Reply