The Missing Link

Pudfark

The Missing Link

Post by Pudfark »

Now we know -- President Obama was MIA on Benghazi

The Benghazi terrorist attack was a debacle in three distinct stages. The fatal mistakes occurred in the first two — the failure to provide adequate security before the attack and the failure to provide help once it started. Those mistakes were tragic, but the Obama administration’s explanations are coherent, though hardly defensible.
The mystery always has been the third stage — the aftermath, or more accurately, the coverup. Even before the bodies of the four Americans came home, the White House was eager to tell any story except the real one.

Aides twisted and turned to create the false narrative that a protest over an anti-Muslim video was spontaneously hijacked by radicals. But two problems quickly emerged: There was no video protest in Benghazi, and the attack, which used heavy weaponry, was well planned.

So, why did the White House spin the web of deceit? Don’t they know the cover up is worse than the crime?

Finally, we have the answer, thanks to Defense Secretary Leon Panetta. In his reluctant Senate testimony, he provided the missing piece of the puzzle: The commander in chief was MIA. The coverup was created to protect his absence.
According to Panetta, President Obama checked in with his military team early on during the attack, then checked out for the rest of the night. The next day, we already knew, he blamed the video maker and flew to Las Vegas for a campaign event.

Meanwhile, half a world away, Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans had been slaughtered by Islamists. Their murders on the 11th anniversary of 9/11 gave the incident extra gravity and led the White House to conceal the facts. An honest chronology would have revealed the president’s shocking behavior during the most successful attack against Americans by foreigners since 9/11.

Imagine the questions that would have come: What did Obama do through the long, bloody night? Whom did he talk to? When did he learn that Stevens was dead?
There is still much we don’t know, but Panetta, under persistent Senate probing, revealed that Obama simply wasn’t involved. Did he just go to sleep?
That question, like other good ones, was asked by Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina. Panetta and the chairman of the joint chiefs, Martin Dempsey, told Graham they didn’t sleep, but said they didn’t know if Obama did.

You would think a presidential conscience would keep him awake and engaged until he knew what had happened in Benghazi. You would be wrong.

Instead, the two officials said they had only one, 30-minute conversation with Obama. It began at around 5 p.m. Washington time, 90 minutes after the first attack started, and they never spoke to him again that night.

The president’s only instructions, Panetta said, were, “Do whatever you need to do,” though he left the details “up to us.”

The president never asked what military assets could be used, where they were and when they would get to Benghazi. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton never spoke to them at all, Panetta said.

By the time the meeting with Obama ended, one American was dead, Stevens was missing and the survivors had retreated to a nearby villa.
At 2 a.m. in Benghazi (8 p.m. in DC), the villa also came under mortar and gunfire attack in what witnesses called a planned, sophisticated ambush. Two more Americans died there.

About four hours later, at dawn in Libya, officials retrieved Stevens’ body from a hospital. He had been alive when he was taken there by Libyans who converged on the burned-out consulate after the first attack; they found him unconscious in an interior room, and a doctor could not revive him.

More than two hours after that, after 8 a.m. in Libya and 2 a.m. in Washington, a State Department plane left with the last group of survivors and four bodies.
It would be nice to know what Obama did during the nearly 11 hours from the start of the first attack until that plane left Libya, but in truth, we know enough to understand the meaning. His detachment during a terrorist attack was a shameful dereliction of duty.

Had he been a military officer, he would face charges. If he were George Bush, he would face ridicule and condemnation, at the least.

But this is Barack Obama, the president who went missing during a terrorist attack against America and escapes without a scratch.

Michael Goodwin is a Fox News contributor and New York Post columnist.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/02/ ... z2KhBde5CX

Well Slick...time to oil up yer goose gun and fire up the oven. Looking forward
to your explain. This is why we need the Second Amemdment.
Pudfark

Re: The Missing Link

Post by Pudfark »

The "Plot" gets..."Thicker"

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/02 ... ok-claims/

Which explains....a bunch. They (Obama & Some) all knew.

They turned their backsides to Americans.
Then they lied about it. If, I had voted for
Obama....I'd be pissed off and thinking about
Impeachment.


However, I didn't vote for him.
So, Impeachment is the proper course and
some Jail Time.
Barfly
Posts: 686
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:33 pm

Re: The Missing Link

Post by Barfly »

I've always believed that the administration lit the fires in North Africa, or directly assisted elements within countries there to topple their governments - and we've been moving that process along as discretely as possible - that there is evidence now that some of this is being done outside the leadership of the CIA - is telling. The timing of the Patraeus 'scandal' is more than suspect....

Perhaps our CINC is assisting who we would normally categorize at radical islamacists, to reestablish their caliphate. That's what it looks like; it's definitely a possibility. Perhaps that's not his intent, and he's just ignorant to the likely cause and effect of our 'assistance' in that region.
Pudfark

Re: The Missing Link

Post by Pudfark »

Sounds plausible to me...Barfly.

If, when, Slick comes along?
Maybe he can supply a time line for Obama during this massacre?
Maybe a "good" reason for the cover up and blatant lying that has
gone on?

Anywho, Barfly...don't ya find it interesting on the timing of these details
being released? North Korea detonates another A bomb and Obama's got
the big speech tonight....timing is everything.... :roll:
Pudfark

Re: The Missing Link

Post by Pudfark »

Hot off "Google"...more missing links...
http://www.google.com/search?q=where+wa ... e&ie=UTF-8
Barfly
Posts: 686
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:33 pm

Re: The Missing Link

Post by Barfly »

I don't expect any response from Slick, Pud, :) As much more detail is probably forthcoming, this isn't a good time for him to potentially stick his foot-in-mouth. He is a betting man though, so who knows, lol.
Pudfark

Re: The Missing Link

Post by Pudfark »

;) + :)
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: The Missing Link

Post by callmeslick »

more bullshit from predictable sources....'nuff said.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
Pudfark

Re: The Missing Link

Post by Pudfark »

Much like Obama was missing for 11 hours?
You went missing, yesterday. ;)
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: The Missing Link

Post by callmeslick »

Pudfark wrote:Much like Obama was missing for 11 hours?
You went missing, yesterday. ;)
getting a house ready for the market. Life trumps CWOS. :)
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
Post Reply