Darkhorse wrote:I am thinking "stupid and not getting it" falls onto you. The banning of any firearm is the issue! I could care less if you and your type think it is "NECESSARY"!! Once we let you get your foot in the door when will it stop? That is the issue!!!
so, you have a problem with the current restrictions on machine guns, grenade launchers and bazookas? No different.
Google will tell you the difference!
Now we have demonstrable evidence that if you try to lead from behind, eventually the guys up front will stop looking back for instructions.
Government-coerced expression is a feature of dictatorships that has no place in a free country
Lib's don't like to use Google....
The facts there....never agree with their opinions.
Which is why?
Rarely, will you ever see a link from them.
Mostly, you'll see stuff like....."I heard from
a friend of a friend at the "Rod & Bottle Club"
who's distantly related to so&so who said "crap"
and that's a fact".
I've been thinking about how this thread went, and it pissed me off.
Read my 1st post. Then read slicks 1st post in response. Keep in mind he never clicked on the link.
He made assumptions that it was about hunting with assault rifles. When in fact I was pointing out assault rifles being used for personal defense in the LA riots He's been whining about us showing no proof of an assault rifle being used for personal defense, and when I do he doesn't bother to read it.
Then when I point it out to him he says the police should have taken care of it. Huh? During the LA riots?? They were outnumbered 1000 to 1, and could hardly protect everybody. It was a free for all, and the ones with the biggest guns wins. If you were there with the Bloods and the Crips in control. You'd understand why the cops were nowhere to be found.
I agree with that Buzz.
It sorta makes me wonder?
If, Slick and his ilk, armed solely with their opinions,
feel inadequate compared to folks who hold their opinions,
in there hand.
What he doesn't realize?
There's a lot of folks, who won't be
disarmed with an opinion and won't be
disarmed by a disingenuous law.
It all boils down to his philosophy?
"Ignore the facts, promote the opinion"
Pudfark wrote:Lib's don't like to use Google....
The facts there....never agree with their opinions.
Which is why?
Rarely, will you ever see a link from them.
Mostly, you'll see stuff like....."I heard from
a friend of a friend at the "Rod & Bottle Club"
who's distantly related to so&so who said "crap"
and that's a fact".
Those who don't know how to use their hands.... find it hard to grasp facts... they can always dream...
Pudfark wrote:Lib's don't like to use Google....
The facts there....never agree with their opinions.
Got a link from Google to prove that?
Pudfark wrote:Which is why?
Rarely, will you ever see a link from them.
That's because Google isn't spelled like this, "F..o..x..n..e..w..s"
Pudfark wrote:Mostly, you'll see stuff like....."I heard from
a friend of a friend at the "Rod & Bottle Club"
who's distantly related to so&so who said "crap"
and that's a fact".
Yeah, like if you were some Texan dude who had a second relative twice removed who was once posted somewhere in eastern Canada.
