The Bill

Pudfark

The Bill

Post by Pudfark »

Texas bill would block police from enforcing new federal gun laws

AUSTIN, Texas – Under a measure advancing in the Texas Capitol, local police officers could be convicted of a crime for enforcing any new federal gun control laws.

Rep. Steve Toth, a newly elected Republican from the Woodlands, said his proposal would prevent officers from carrying out any future federal orders to confiscate assault rifles and ammunition magazines.

Toth's proposal would create a Class A misdemeanor for police officers enforcing any new federal gun regulations. It also would establish cause for the state attorney general to sue anyone who seeks to enforce new federal gun regulations. It is one of several states-rights measures being offered by conservative state lawmakers nationwide in response to federal gun control proposals.


FOX NEWS LINK: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/02 ... z2ArsDiM25

:D
HappyHappy

Re: The Bill

Post by HappyHappy »

Finally some sanity in law making!
1860 continues to haunt us....

HH
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: The Bill

Post by callmeslick »

obviously unconstitutional....no link needed, brain-dead obvious
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
Barfly
Posts: 686
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:33 pm

Re: The Bill

Post by Barfly »

callmeslick wrote:obviously unconstitutional....no link needed, brain-dead obvious
http://garydhalbert.com/2013/01/31/how- ... eme-court/

Sheriffs cannot be forced to implement a federal law - ruled by the Supreme Court when elements of the Brady Law were challenged. The federal government can task federal agents to implement law, not Local Sheriffs etc.

There's plenty of room for legal argument between application of the "supremacy clause" and the 10th Amendment, before you blurt out unconstitutional. Yes, maybe some brain-dead lazarus types would quickly pop up and agree with your unsupported point, many others with working brains would find it easy to substantiate disagreement.

http://www.yalelawjournal.org/pdf/112-8/WaxmanFINAL.pdf
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: The Bill

Post by callmeslick »

I disagree, Barfly, on these grounds--in this case(which probably won't pass the legislature anyway), the State is mandating non-compliance with Federal Law. It isn't like some minor jurisdiction is failing to enforce, which can be for budget reasons or whatever. The latter situation is common.....I recall a mounted cop down in the French Quarter, when I asked if it wasn't against Federal law to sell large quantities of nitrous oxide for non-commercial use, "son, I am just here to enforce Parish law, the Feds can do what they want". Now, if Louisiana passed a bill mandating him not to uphold Federal law, the courts would, I feel, slap it down, fast.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
Pudfark

Re: The Bill

Post by Pudfark »

callmeslick wrote:obviously unconstitutional....no link needed, brain-dead obvious
It's only "obviously unconstitutional" when you don't personally agree with it.
Take fer instance...Colorado and smoking dope and Federal Law... :)

Barfly hit the nail on the head again. :D
It sure is funny to watch Slick dance, the "two faced jitterbug". ;)
Pudfark

Re: The Bill

Post by Pudfark »

Crap...yer cramping me up Slick...

Fed cops can only enforce fed laws.
State cops can only enforce state and fed laws.
Local cops can enforce local, state and fed laws.
There ain't nuthin in the law books that mandates a
Texas Cop to enforce Fed Law....it's optional 8-)
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: The Bill

Post by callmeslick »

Pudfark wrote:
callmeslick wrote:obviously unconstitutional....no link needed, brain-dead obvious
It's only "obviously unconstitutional" when you don't personally agree with it.
Take fer instance...Colorado and smoking dope and Federal Law... :)
a good example, actually, Pud......thus far, the Feds haven't taken that one to Federal Court, but what Colorado is doing (and Washington) is suspect.
Barfly hit the nail on the head again. :D
It sure is funny to watch Slick dance, the "two faced jitterbug". ;)
no dance here, I guess you started drinking early and are just seeing things.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: The Bill

Post by callmeslick »

Pudfark wrote:Crap...yer cramping me up Slick...

Fed cops can only enforce fed laws.
State cops can only enforce state and fed laws.
Local cops can enforce local, state and fed laws.
There ain't nuthin in the law books that mandates a
Texas Cop to enforce Fed Law....it's optional 8-)
correct, but the State cannot declare that a law not be enforced. It's the State mandate part that is a no-no.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
User avatar
Reservoir_Dog
Posts: 8858
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.

Re: The Bill

Post by Reservoir_Dog »

Pudfark wrote:Crap...yer cramping me up Slick...

Fed cops can only enforce fed laws.
State cops can only enforce state and fed laws.
Local cops can enforce local, state and fed laws.
There ain't nuthin in the law books that mandates a
Texas Cop to enforce Fed Law....it's optional 8-)
And what about the National Guard?
Post Reply