Missouri Democrats propose forcing some gun owners to
- callmeslick
- Posts: 16473
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
- Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
Re: Missouri Democrats propose forcing some gun owners to
you don't and never will have the critical mass of the population behind you. Never. That is the difference between now and 1855-60. No one on this end has forgotten anything, it's just that we seem to be a little more educated on our history than you show yourself to be. No surprise there.
-
Pudfark
Re: Missouri Democrats propose forcing some gun owners to
Human nature has not changed since recorded history began.
Feel free to interpret that "your way".
People who get pissed off, fight.
It's a fact.
Though people like you?
Who get pissed off?
Find others to do their fighting for them.
Which is the main reason of?
Why? You have such difficulty understanding this historical concept.
Meaning?
You'll vote.
You just ain't willing to bleed...in order to have a vote.
On that there above?
We're in agreement.
Feel free to interpret that "your way".
People who get pissed off, fight.
It's a fact.
Though people like you?
Who get pissed off?
Find others to do their fighting for them.
Which is the main reason of?
Why? You have such difficulty understanding this historical concept.
Meaning?
You'll vote.
You just ain't willing to bleed...in order to have a vote.
On that there above?
We're in agreement.
- callmeslick
- Posts: 16473
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
- Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
Re: Missouri Democrats propose forcing some gun owners to
a small, pissed-off minority is going to get slapped down, immediately. They can 'fight' all they want, but unless a large majority is with them, the fight is doomed.Pudfark wrote:Human nature has not changed since recorded history began.
Feel free to interpret that "your way".![]()
People who get pissed off, fight.
It's a fact.
not really, we're just smart enough to organize before we fight.Though people like you?
Who get pissed off?
Find others to do their fighting for them.
sure,just because I know how to write English properly, and use it in a sentence, shouldn't imply that I can read History any better than you, right??Which is the main reason of?
Why? You have such difficulty understanding this historical concept.
ummm, you know this, because??Meaning?
You'll vote.
You just ain't willing to bleed...in order to have a vote.
-
Pudfark
Re: Missouri Democrats propose forcing some gun owners to
I know this "You just ain't willing to bleed...in order to have a vote." ?
You ain't served, anybody, but yourself.
How do I know that?
The only time you have alluded to have been in danger of bleeding?
Was when ya was running dope with/for criminals...you said so, yourself.
That's how I know.
You ain't served, anybody, but yourself.
How do I know that?
The only time you have alluded to have been in danger of bleeding?
Was when ya was running dope with/for criminals...you said so, yourself.
That's how I know.
- callmeslick
- Posts: 16473
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
- Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
Re: Missouri Democrats propose forcing some gun owners to
and this proves willingness, how??Pudfark wrote:I know this "You just ain't willing to bleed...in order to have a vote." ?
You ain't served, anybody, but yourself.
actually, running dope was but a small part of the whole enterprise, along with loaning money and collecting protection.How do I know that?
The only time you have alluded to have been in danger of bleeding?
Was when ya was running dope with/for criminals...you said so, yourself.
fixed for accuracyThat's how I know,well nothing, actually.