Sequester?
Sequester?
I can't believe you twits aren't talking about this?
Re: Sequester?
Well, you guys talk about other stupid crap. I figured what was all over the news would be a hot topic?
A loss of 750,000 jobs, seniors put on the street, and a huge cutback on the military isn't worth talking about?
A loss of 750,000 jobs, seniors put on the street, and a huge cutback on the military isn't worth talking about?
Re: Sequester?
Now you've done it. RD will be along to tell you agenda isn't capped.Pudfark wrote:None of that's important.
The Agenda comes first.
-
Pudfark
Re: Sequester?
Really Buzz...it's no big deal.
If it were?
Obama wouldn't be going on vacation.
If it were?
Obama wouldn't be going on vacation.
Re: Sequester?
Like the repubs? This whole stupid deal is being held up by the repubs not agreeing with closing tax loopholes for the rich.
What is your stand on this?
What is your stand on this?
- callmeslick
- Posts: 16473
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
- Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
Re: Sequester?
Buzz, you are correct.....and, I suspect, the Repubs are going to find out from their constituents(the dwindling few) just how important that spending that gets dismissed as 'discretionary' really is, in people's lives.