Sequester?

[callmeslick]

note, also, Buzz, that Pud didn't really defend this(leaving the thankless, and sort of silly task to poor CUDA), but deflected to Benghazi. Sort of like the other thread where he went off topic to attack my education and higher education in general after getting slapped down on his nutty assertion that all hardworking people are conservative. The boy, as you might be starting to see, posts gibberish and ducks any real discussion. Some folks wonder why I treat this forum as a sort of joke any more, Pud might be example one. HH is a straight-up fool, and lots of other folks are fun to exchange thoughts with, but Pud just spreads his crap like an Amish farmer in springtime, dominates threads by sheer volume, yet says nothing of substance.

[Buzz]

I find myself skipping through Pud's posts. If I read them at all. It's more work trying to figure out what he's saying than it's worth. Just get to the damn point!

[callmeslick]

I find myself skipping through? Pud's posts
. If I read them at all. It's more work trying??
to figure out what?
he's saying than it's worth. Just get to the damn point!

filtered through the Pud translation software.....

[Buzz]

You quote funny.

[Barfly]

I find myself skipping through? Pud's posts
. If I read them at all. It's more work trying??
to figure out what?
he's saying than it's worth. Just get to the damn point!

filtered through the Pud translation software.....

Ya got the mechanics of the arrangement right, but I ain't feelin' the music.

[CUDA]

Cuda....It's an 85 billion dollar cut. If you think that's peanuts. You're ricer than I think.

Let me give you examples of how it will affect lives that can't handle it. 2 billion cut from the HUD program. That's putting the poor, elderly, and disabled on the street.

It's estimated it will cost 750,000 jobs if it's in effect long enough.

The list is much longer if you care to research it.

As for the GOP looking bad? They don't need any help for that.

85 BILLION OUT OF 3.6 TRILLION. it's only 2.3% Buzz ANYBusiness owner will tell you that 2.3% which i will reiterate is NOT A CUT. it's just less of a spending increase. is peanuts. there are hundreds of billions of dollars in waste the the GAO has spotted. so why are we trying to scare the masses with what effectually amounts to a nothing. and I will say again. THIS IS NOT A CUT. do not be deceived by the lies. the budget was still increased just not by as much.

[Buzz]

It's what's being cut that's the problem. It's not programs that would normally be touched.

750,000 jobs lost isn't enough for you? 125,000 seniors put on the street doesn't affect you?

You sound like a republican.

[Pudfark]

Slick is "fact resistant" to math and it's application in this "Sequester".
Although, it should be noted that his "pump fake" on the ruse intended, is obvious.
Really Slick, if this is such an issue? Why ain't you people running across the aisle?
Either way?

[Pudfark]

Buzz you are Slick's gullible foil in this chicanery.

[CUDA]

It's what's being cut that's the problem. It's not programs that would normally be touched.

750,000 jobs lost isn't enough for you? 125,000 seniors put on the street doesn't affect you?

You sound like a republican.

your showing your ignorance to the situation. the ONLY part of this less spending that is across the board is the military. STOP LISTENING TO THE LIES OF THIS PRESIDENT. all other cuts he has the ability to move where ever he wants. Congress and the Republicans have told him so. if he is cutting seniors it's because THAT'S WHAT THE PRESIDENT CHOSE TO CUT.

Buzz seriously doode you need to stop hunting and read more. the white house is playing the chicken little scenario. they have achieved exactly what they intended to with you. they've scared you into believing their lie