For Barfly & CUDA

CUDA
Posts: 1384
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:23 pm
Location: The lone Conservative voice in the Liberal Bastion of Portland Oregon

Re: For Barfly & CUDA

Post by CUDA »

Because he prefers to spend what you have instead
"In reality, there exists only fact and fiction.
Opinions result from a lack of the former and a reliance on the latter."

Image
Pudfark

Re: For Barfly & CUDA

Post by Pudfark »

CUDA wrote:Because he prefers to spend what you have instead
That and all he can borrow with you as his forced co-signer.
HappyHappy

Re: For Barfly & CUDA

Post by HappyHappy »

Obama caused it, Obama is a rabid Communist and will never negotiate.
Republicans are trying to control spending while the POS Obama is
trying to bankrupt the nation.

Fuck Obama and his minions.

HH
Pudfark

Re: For Barfly & CUDA

Post by Pudfark »

It's a little early in the day to talk about Slick that way.... :P
User avatar
Buzz
Posts: 2240
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:37 pm
Location: Colorado

Re: For Barfly & CUDA

Post by Buzz »

Pudfark wrote:
CUDA wrote:
Buzz wrote:Yeah, it's real funny that almost 4 billion is being taken out of the HUD program, and that Meals On Wheels will be shut down.

Who cares right? They're just a bunch of old farts with disabilities. They don't need a place to live. They don't need to eat. Just let them go to the streets and starve.

This is better than closing the tax loopholes on the rich right?

Fucking idiots! I wouldn't give you the sweat off my ass if you were dying of thirst.
BLAME THE PRESIDENT HE CHOSE WHAT TO CUT :P
Further truth/proof of what CUDA says below:

Washington Post calls it ‘strange,’ ‘sad’ that Obama refused GOP offer to control spending cuts
POSTED MARCH 1, 2013 AT 10:18 AM BY EDDIE SCARRY

The last effort by congressional Republicans to soften the sequester blow was to give the White House power to target where the $85 billion in spending reductions would come from. President Obama rejected the offer and the Washington Post is upset about it.

From the paper’s lead editorial today:

No doubt the White House didn’t want to “own” potentially unpopular specific cuts any more than the House GOP does. (Two Democrats, including Virginia’s Mark R. Warner, voted to proceed on the bill.)

Washington has reached a strange place indeed when the opposition party offers the president more control over spending — and he refuses it. Apparently, in addition to its policy objections, the White House figured that a softened sequester couldn’t force Republicans to accept a long-term deal including higher revenue. It’s a gamble that the worse things might get now, the better they will get later. A strange place, and a sad one.

Sequestration officially kicks in today.

Buzz, are you ever misinformed or mistaken?
Not misinformed at all. I've already stated that i'm blaming both sides.

You, on the other hand are putting all the blame on Obama. Typical.
User avatar
Buzz
Posts: 2240
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:37 pm
Location: Colorado

Re: For Barfly & CUDA

Post by Buzz »

"Add away chicken little. You're freaking out about something that you don't know will happen. You're buying into the lies told to scare you. Amazing "........Cuda




Get your head out of the sand, and get informed Cuda. You think everybody is being fooled, except you? :lol:
Pudfark

Re: For Barfly & CUDA

Post by Pudfark »

No offense Buzz...you bought into it totally.
You got rid of your 2nd Amendment rights.....voluntarily.
As a result of that choice, you made?
You disarmed yourself and disassociated yourself from the responsible folks.
I accept your choice.
I don't accept your whining about it.

Go defend your country,neighbors,thoughts and principals with yer fly rod.
I didn't say "yourself"...in the above...cause you don't care.
CUDA
Posts: 1384
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:23 pm
Location: The lone Conservative voice in the Liberal Bastion of Portland Oregon

Re: For Barfly & CUDA

Post by CUDA »


President Obama and top administration officials are struggling with accuracy in explaining the impact of billions in federal budget cuts known as sequester that kicked in Saturday morning -- even getting called out by a Capitol Hill superintendent about furloughs for support staffers.

Carlos Elias, the Capitol Building superintendent, sent out a memo Friday reminding staffers that the current sequestration plan does not include “reductions in force or furloughs” and that “pay and benefit of each of our employees will not be impacted.”


Though not directly mentioning Obama by name, Elias also said in the memo that a “high-ranking official said employees that clean and maintain the U.S. Capitol will receive a cut in pay.”

Hours before the memo was released, the president, in what appears to be the administration’s attempt to maximize the potential impact of the cuts, said at a press conference: “Starting tomorrow everybody here, all the folks who are cleaning the floors at the Capitol. Now that Congress has left, somebody’s going to be vacuuming and cleaning those floors and throwing out the garbage. They’re going to have less pay. The janitors, the security guards, they just got a pay cut, and they’ve got to figure out how to manage that. That’s real.”

The cuts were proposed by the president and agree upon by Congress in 2011 after Democrats and Republicans failed to agree on a more measured way to reduce the deficit. The $85 billion in cuts in 2013 to the Defense Department and domestic program will be more like $45 billion when pro-rated this year.

Last weekend, Education Secretary Arne Duncan told CBS “there are literally teachers now who are getting pink slips, who are getting notices that they can’t come back this fall." However, Duncan appeared to backpedaling Wednesday, coming up with just one example, a West Virginia county, and the disclaimer that “whether it’s all sequester-related, I don’t know.”

Officials in the state’s Kanawha County told The Washington Post that “transfer notices” were sent to at least 104 educators and they had more to do with how West Virginia allocates federal dollars designated for poor children.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/03 ... z2MPKnjV18
so it appeared the President lied.AGAIN he said all those people would be getting a pay cut. yet the person that actually makes those decisions says it's not going to happen
who is the greater fool the fool or the fool that follows
"In reality, there exists only fact and fiction.
Opinions result from a lack of the former and a reliance on the latter."

Image
Pudfark

Re: For Barfly & CUDA

Post by Pudfark »

That's pretty strong CUDA :lol:

I see it as more "Tourette's Truth Syndrome" in reverse ?
He just can't help blurting out a lie... ;)

Old Pudfark sez: " If'n he saw it on the teleprompter, it has to be true. "
User avatar
Buzz
Posts: 2240
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:37 pm
Location: Colorado

Re: For Barfly & CUDA

Post by Buzz »

Pudfark wrote:No offense Buzz...you bought into it totally.
You got rid of your 2nd Amendment rights.....voluntarily.
As a result of that choice, you made?
You disarmed yourself and disassociated yourself from the responsible folks.
I accept your choice.
I don't accept your whining about it.

Go defend your country,neighbors,thoughts and principals with yer fly rod.
I didn't say "yourself"...in the above...cause you don't care.
You really are confused. (again) This thread is about the sequester.

Your assumptions are also wrong. I got rid of my guns, because my heart is fucked up. (I posted that) I don't want to haul out 300lbs of elk meat at 12,000ft anymore. I didn't disassociate myself from any group, and i'm still on the side of gun owners.

So, who's the one whining? Yes, it's still you.
Post Reply