because the only way to consider that value of taking on debt for a college degree is to look at the opportunity for income over a career. Also, who says job opportunities for grads has been limited 'under Obama'....they've been steadily improving. As, by the way, I demonstrated.Pudfark wrote:What does 30-40 years of employment have to do with a young persons very limited job opportunities under Obama?
right, and as I clearly stated above, the debt is money well spent for virtually anyone.Remember? Student Debt vs Graduate Jobs that's the topic here?
actually, no, you brought it up in the context of this discussion, and I have no doubt that others saw it as you bailing visibly after losing the debate.No change in the plan, Obama and you brought sequestration into the mix. Confusing isn't it. It was meant to be originally, by Obama.