White House Job Applicant's (short list)

CUDA
Posts: 1384
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:23 pm
Location: The lone Conservative voice in the Liberal Bastion of Portland Oregon

Re: White House Job Applicant's (short list)

Post by CUDA »

Its easy to spew shit without proof, and if you do it enough some people will believe it. Much like I said about MSNBC.
What slick fails to remember. His accusation, his burdon of proof.
It not my responsability to research and back up his post. And posting things in that manner just as well be posting a lie. He ASSumes that I havent looked it up already. I had, but I wanted to see what kind of left wing bullshit he was going to post this time.

Its just too damn bad that he's "too busy" to back up his assertions. The real world calls that bearing false witness.

He constantly does it with the hopes that some fool will believe it. Lets just throw shit up against the wall and see what sticks
"In reality, there exists only fact and fiction.
Opinions result from a lack of the former and a reliance on the latter."

Image
CUDA
Posts: 1384
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:23 pm
Location: The lone Conservative voice in the Liberal Bastion of Portland Oregon

Re: White House Job Applicant's (short list)

Post by CUDA »

fatman wrote:
callmeslick wrote: hardly the case, Fats. Actually,
Hardly that case Slick leave fraud aside for the momemnt infact if fraud is invlolved ites even worse but 52% total turnout there is no majority gov

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_turn ... _elections
Wow a post backed up with evidence. Imagine that.

Fats HOW DID YOU FIND THE TIME?
"In reality, there exists only fact and fiction.
Opinions result from a lack of the former and a reliance on the latter."

Image
HappyHappy

Re: White House Job Applicant's (short list)

Post by HappyHappy »

Joseph Goebbles is so proud of Callmesick.
Callmeshit it using a minor stolen majority to
make a last desperate attempt to disarm the people.
This is his chance. A last chance to consolidate power
and establish a dictatorship of the proletariat.
Imagine the glory of having the puppet Obama regime with absolute
power with Nancy Pelosi and Dianne Feinstein calling the shots.
Pure bliss.


HH
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: White House Job Applicant's (short list)

Post by callmeslick »

CUDA wrote:Its easy to spew shit without proof, and if you do it enough some people will believe it. Much like I said about MSNBC.
What slick fails to remember. His accusation, his burdon of proof.
It not my responsability to research and back up his post. And posting things in that manner just as well be posting a lie. He ASSumes that I havent looked it up already. I had, but I wanted to see what kind of left wing bullshit he was going to post this time.

Its just too damn bad that he's "too busy" to back up his assertions. The real world calls that bearing false witness.

He constantly does it with the hopes that some fool will believe it. Lets just throw shit up against the wall and see what sticks

so sayeth the fellow tossing around bogus Founding Father quotes like candy at the Halloween parade.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: White House Job Applicant's (short list)

Post by callmeslick »

CUDA wrote:
fatman wrote:
callmeslick wrote: hardly the case, Fats. Actually,
Hardly that case Slick leave fraud aside for the momemnt infact if fraud is invlolved ites even worse but 52% total turnout there is no majority gov

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_turn ... _elections
Wow a post backed up with evidence. Imagine that.

Fats HOW DID YOU FIND THE TIME?

and, Fats makes a valid point about US turnout, which explains much of our political problems....right and left. However, it might be worth noting that the turnout during Obama's two victories was pretty good in comparison to other recent elections.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
Pudfark

Re: White House Job Applicant's (short list)

Post by Pudfark »

HappyHappy wrote:Joseph Goebbles is so proud of Callmesick.
Callmeshit it using a minor stolen majority to
make a last desperate attempt to disarm the people.
This is his chance. A last chance to consolidate power
and establish a dictatorship of the proletariat.
Imagine the glory of having the puppet Obama regime with absolute
power with Nancy Pelosi and Dianne Feinstein calling the shots.
Pure bliss.


HH

Much truth to the above. The "house of cards" is in jeopardy.
Seems at the moment, Obama is just trying to hold on until
2014 and the elections. Even Slick would have to admit....
Obama pissed away his first two years in office. It is as you
called it HH "desperation".

What I sorta like earlier from Slick was the "childs argument/excuse" concerning voter fraud and how everybody does it, so it's ok. Never once entertaining the thought? That the results of that "election" are fraudulent and certainly not binding on anybody. No matter how much he whines about it. Then old Slick has the gall to flaunt the percentages from that illegal election to substantiate and further additional illegal activity. Then..to add insult to his argument, Slick calls others unamerican.

So, yeah HH I see your point. :)

Old Pudfark sez: " The "Fraudulent 53%...the New Super Majority... "
CUDA
Posts: 1384
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:23 pm
Location: The lone Conservative voice in the Liberal Bastion of Portland Oregon

Re: White House Job Applicant's (short list)

Post by CUDA »

callmeslick wrote:
CUDA wrote:Its easy to spew shit without proof, and if you do it enough some people will believe it. Much like I said about MSNBC.
What slick fails to remember. His accusation, his burdon of proof.
It not my responsability to research and back up his post. And posting things in that manner just as well be posting a lie. He ASSumes that I havent looked it up already. I had, but I wanted to see what kind of left wing bullshit he was going to post this time.

Its just too damn bad that he's "too busy" to back up his assertions. The real world calls that bearing false witness.

He constantly does it with the hopes that some fool will believe it. Lets just throw shit up against the wall and see what sticks

so sayeth the fellow tossing around bogus Founding Father quotes like candy at the Halloween parade.
Yes so sayeth the man that attributed the quote to the wrong person. SUE ME. And then got personaly attacked by the man that in typical fashion totally ignored the premise of the quote and went straight to trying to discredit the poster, hoping that no one would notice that he dodged the issue. Thats your MO cant argue the point attack the poster, fling shit don't back it up. Call people hater because you're afraid of criticism. You choose to run from the topic instead of facing it.

Hey I noticed you had more time to post, have you found time to back up your statement yet?
"In reality, there exists only fact and fiction.
Opinions result from a lack of the former and a reliance on the latter."

Image
Pudfark

Re: White House Job Applicant's (short list)

Post by Pudfark »

Here's a timely little quote from Slick.. "I'd never 'ignore' CUDA or anyone, but............" posted on March 28, 2013.... ;)

Old Pudfark sez: " Normally, after the "but", comes the turd.... ;) "
User avatar
Reservoir_Dog
Posts: 8858
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.

Re: White House Job Applicant's (short list)

Post by Reservoir_Dog »

Pudfark wrote:Here's a timely little quote from Slick.. "I'd never 'ignore' CUDA or anyone, but............" posted on March 28, 2013.... ;)

Old Pudfark sez: " Normally, after the "but", comes the turd.... ;) "
:roll: You're an idiot.
HappyHappy

Re: White House Job Applicant's (short list)

Post by HappyHappy »

Reservoir_Dog wrote: I am an idiot


Fixed.

HH
Post Reply