I'm puzzled by your deduction capabilities Holmes.HappyHappy wrote:There is enough real proof that Seal team 6 lobotomised
Usama Bin Larden with a 5.56 NATO round to the forehead.
I don't see the Seals chasing the Occult people.
HH
Nic
I'm puzzled by your deduction capabilities Holmes.HappyHappy wrote:There is enough real proof that Seal team 6 lobotomised
Usama Bin Larden with a 5.56 NATO round to the forehead.
I don't see the Seals chasing the Occult people.
HH

I tossed out quite a bit of coincidences about the chain of events of 911 to link it to some occult societies. For instance, every single one of the flight number has great significant for the followers of occult practices.callmeslick wrote:I'm puzzled as to what Nic's ideas even are. He tosses out conspiracy theory, occult links, Edwardian whack-jobs and other bizzare views, then, when challenged on them, backs off and says 'I didn't say I agreed with them'. Well, then, Nic(and I repeat), merely explain why you tossed them out there.

Glad yo do. I do not.HappyHappy wrote:No deduction.
We know whom planned, ordered and carried out the 9-11 attacks.
We got all the big players and the attackers got themselves.
Usama Bin Larden ordered it.
I rather wish I unknew some stuff.WTF more do you want to know?
I've never used drugs ever...Whatever you are on must be some good shit.

this just came to you? Do read his posts regularly?nicolas10 wrote:I'm puzzled by your deduction capabilities Holmes.HappyHappy wrote:There is enough real proof that Seal team 6 lobotomised
Usama Bin Larden with a 5.56 NATO round to the forehead.
I don't see the Seals chasing the Occult people.
HH
Nic
and other followers of other bents have claimed the world was going to end. I base my thinking on 58 years of some contact with reality, nothing more or nothing less.nicolas10 wrote: I tossed out quite a bit of coincidences about the chain of events of 911 to link it to some occult societies. For instance, every single one of the flight number has great significant for the followers of occult practices.
I guess that's it, I'm not surprised that people looking for 'coincidences' can cobble together a lot of 'coincidences' especially when linking things like numbers(pretty simple stuff) to numbers of significance to completely unrelated schools of whack-job thinking. for the record, I suspect history will indeed show far more complexity to 9/11(and a host of other events).....history always does. My well being isn't better or worse for thinking about 9/11. It's a fait accompli, and I live life today, and keep my options and my eyes open. It's just that open eyes can be easily distracted without the filter of common sense.If you are surprised by this considerable amount of coincidences, you may feel compelled to research the subject further. Unless you know that stuff already & rather employ your energy to discredit my points by always replying to something I never said, and NEVER even tackle what I actually say, or unless the official version is better for your well being.
you are quite correct.....I couldn't give a fuck.You can't even be harsed to quote each of the flight numbers description and say "so what: it's a coincidence".
sorry you read it like that, but no, Nic I don't ignore what you say(I wouldn't respond), and I really, really DON'T want to dismiss you as a nutjob. However, if you are going to string together non-cohesive coincidences and posit them as some sort of evidence, I am going to call you on it. Every time.All your effort is aimed at completely ignoring everything I say & calling me a nutjob, which I don't care about at all, but I'm not going to waste my time replying to the same ole' all the time. What was it in your other post "opportunity for honest discourse". Trololol.
Nic
Coincidences are not evidence. They're just there to show you when something looks fishy and that you should look into it.callmeslick wrote:sorry you read it like that, but no, Nic I don't ignore what you say(I wouldn't respond), and I really, really DON'T want to dismiss you as a nutjob. However, if you are going to string together non-cohesive coincidences and posit them as some sort of evidence, I am going to call you on it. Every time.
