Walmart health plan is cheaper with more coverage

[Pudfark]

Surprise! Walmart health plan is cheaper, offers more coverage than Obamacare
http://washingtonexaminer.com/surprise- ... edium=feed

Washington Examiner comparison of the two health insurance programs found that Walmart's plan is more affordable and provides significantly better access to high-quality medical care than Obamacare.

Journal of the American Medical Association analysis from September showed that unsubsidized Obamacare enrollees will face monthly premiums that are five to nine times higher than Walmart premiums.

Pud's Opinion: How can this be? Read the whole link Slick...ya might be a dab startled? I was. If, the article is true and at this moment, it might/should be? Then what?

I think if it holds water, somebodies gonna drown.

[Pudfark]

Who is this guy?

http://www.hoover.org/fellows/10107

What did he write/author?

Exposing the world's great lie about ObamaCare and socialized medicine
By Scott Atlas

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2014/01/ ... =obnetwork

Why should everybody here read it?

Pud's opinion: This fella is more adroitly saying what I've been saying, for the last several years.

[callmeslick]

more BS. Wait and watch this become as popular as Medicare, until they both get rolled into one plan by Hillary, saving us a few billion more per year.

[HappyHappy]

more BS. Wait and watch this become as popular as Medicare, until they both get rolled into one plan by Hillary, saving us a few billion more per year.

Billary will have no chance at the rate things are going.
But I never underestimate the stupidity of the US population.

HH

[callmeslick]

you're living proof of that, Slappy. And, if the election were held today, Hillary would win in a landslide.....and she hasn't even geared up the campaign yet.

[Pudfark]

more BS. Wait and watch this become as popular as Medicare, until they both get rolled into one plan by Hillary, saving us a few billion more per year.

"BS"? Did ya read the authors "bio"? or is it "BS"? cuz yer "bio" is better?

On further thought...seems yer shootin an opinion...from the hip.
If not? Whose opinion are ya going by and what are their "creds"?

BTW, thanks fer giving it a read...

[Pudfark]

you're living proof of that, Slappy. And, if the election were held today, Hillary would win in a landslide.....and she hasn't even geared up the campaign yet.

You may have a point there....Obama is proving to be that bad...maybe, she'll step in a finish the last three years out for our elected impostor....

However, I don't believe she can (if elected) change anything...especially the ACA to single pay.
Keep living the "dream"...

[callmeslick]

just watch.

[Pudfark]

Watch these...

CNN'S JAKE TAPPER: CLINTON WILL NEED TO ANSWER A LOT OF QUESTIONS ON BENGHAZI IF SHE RUNS
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2 ... f-She-Runs

DEMOCRATS CANNIBALIZE EACH OTHER OVER OBAMACARE
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government ... -Obamacare

They are from: CNN and NBC

[callmeslick]

Breitbart takes normal conversation on CNN and sensationalizes it. So what? Of course, Clinton will have to answer questions about EVERYTHING during her tenure at State. And, no, Democrats are not cannibalizing a damn soul over the ACA. It has glitches, the Dems are pressuring to fix them, but hell, Virginia's new governor ran on the fact that he is both supportive of the ACA and going to expand it's coverage in the Commonwealth. More gloom and doom from people who see their electoral demise heading towards them, quickly.

Oh, and have you realized yet, Pud, that in your first post in this thread, you are comparing a corporate plan(which is subsidized, and a group plan) to individual coverage, which is neither subsidized nor group? I wonder if you or anyone you ever knew have tried to purchase individual health insurance prior to the ACA. If so, you would not be criticizing the Act, as it has been a godsend, especially to anyone over age 45.