The way you blindly support the party of Queers and Commies I have my doubts.callmeslick wrote:I'm not interested in 'drilling' you, anywhere, anyhow.....seriously.
HH
The way you blindly support the party of Queers and Commies I have my doubts.callmeslick wrote:I'm not interested in 'drilling' you, anywhere, anyhow.....seriously.
What's wrote in blue are my current responses...just seemed easier this way to do it.callmeslick wrote:and what I'm saying is what is 'it'?? There are, in most all states, several plans to choose from.Pudfark wrote:What I'm sayin' is it could be a lot better and why isn't it?callmeslick wrote:Like I said the first time you floated this: the report is utter nonsense, and yet another transparent attempt to sell the concept that the ACA is bad. Sorta funny is all the stories starting to trickle in on other forums of people finding that the new insurance they got via the ACA is really good.
ObamaCare/ACA is Federal Law and imposes certain minimum standards. The Walmart Plan exceeds them for about a third or more/less of the premium cost, not to mention the far more affordable deductible.
Why is that? How did they do it? Walmart has far fewer employees than the population of the entire country...and yet they did it...cheaper and with more benefits. Seems the Walmart Plan should be known as the ACA.
I'm referring not to 'news' stories, but folks on forums similar to this, and FaceBook, noting(often with surprise, as many were skeptical)how well it all workedNow on yer second sentence, could ya link me to all those stories yer referencing? I've been waiting on that for three months.....?
out for them. One just today on CUDA's home forum.
You still, once again, have not provided any direct links to the direct information that I've been asking about, for the last three months. I beginning to believe, they only exist in the "cloud"?
I'm not interested in 'drilling' you, anywhere, anyhow.....seriously.Given your position on ObamaCare....I'd think you jump at the chance....to drill me in the "beans"..
Hard for me to believe....after as many holes as I've drilled in you and your stories....you wouldn't take a shot back at me....if you could?
when you are able to read for comprehension, you will find discussion and debate fun. Until then, you're just destined to be an angry,stupid child.HappyHappy wrote:More to the point is the fact that you are in lock step with your Communist masters
and will never stray from the party line.
HH
Oh, I grasp the facts....I was licensed in the insurance market...to service the contracts/policies. I certainly understand the differences and apparently you do to....cause you have to compare them, to note the differences. You're the fella what said they cannot be compared. Here's a little hint...yep, they's "apples and oranges"....they, however are both "fruit". So, here's whut I been sayin'....if'n ya can pass a law mandating the purchase of "apples and organges" and you purposely keep that division/designation?callmeslick wrote:so long as you cannot grasp the pricing differences inherent in an employer funded plan and an individual policy, I'm wasting my time, Pud. Sorry.