Do I really need to comment?

Pudfark

Re: Do I really need to comment?

Post by Pudfark »

nicolas10 wrote:Now why such people are not treated with a bullet in the head beats me.
When it comes to "pedophiles"...Nic's proposal is the only viable solution.
Nobody in their "right" mind should be concerned about the "cause" of the problem.
Only identifying it and applying the solution, which, most likely will eventually, remove the "cause" of it, in the first place.

On the "satanic" thingy...I really don't give a "damn". If'n they get "out of line"? Give'm a bullet. 8-)

For the lib's here who don't like the bullet thingy...well, throw rocks at them, like the muzzies....do. ;)
User avatar
nicolas10
Posts: 1847
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 8:26 pm

Re: Do I really need to comment?

Post by nicolas10 »

Still waiting for Dawg's comments once he's googled a bit.

He should be back with geschrunken gonaden

Nic
Image
Pudfark

Re: Do I really need to comment?

Post by Pudfark »

nicolas10 wrote:Still waiting for Dawg's comments once he's googled a bit.

He should be back with geschrunken gonaden

Nic
Does that translate to "shriveled balls" ? ;)
Post Reply