The Progressive Path....leads to sociailism

[callmeslick]

finally(pre-football....some stuff is more important than politics, dontcha know):

Old Pudfark sez: The Progressive path....leads to socialism
If so, Pud, given the definition, you are saying the way forward, progress, leads to socialism. Why do you hate capitalism so much?? I, for one, feel that a regulated capitalist economy, with reasonable social safety nets(hence, a bit of socialism), is the most Progressive form of economic model available in the forseeable future. Why don't you?

[Pudfark]

Slick...how predictable of you....an even more feeble attempt at "thread drift".....I have not mentioned economics or capitalism..you have....start your own thread about those things.

The title of this thread is the definition....Much like the truth, ya don't see it....I like our jousting here, it's usually fun, but not near as much... when you ain't paying attention....

Old Pudfark sez: " Quit rubbin dirt on it and git back in the game "

[callmeslick]

Slick...how predictable of you....an even more feeble attempt at "thread drift".....I have not mentioned economics or capitalism..

moron. What do you think socialism IS, exactly? It's an economic system, not government.

The title of this thread is the definition....

no, it isn't. It is your opinion, which as usual, comes out sort of muted, due to your head being up your ass when you speak, apparently.

[callmeslick]

Pud, did you miss this, or just choose to ignore it?
My question to you:
Are you insane, or just fecking stupid? Since when are a bunch of guys willing to COMPLETELY change the dynamics and structure of government, overthrow the status quo and establish the rights of all citizens to 'Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness', in the context of the 18th Century, anything REMOTELY defined as Conservative?

which is it? I'm guessing stupid, based on the bulk of your posts, but mental issues can't be ruled out.....

[Pudfark]

Slick...there ya go with the "Progressive Tactics"...again....

Pud, did you miss this, or just choose to ignore it?
My question to you:
Are you insane, or just fecking stupid? Since when are a bunch of guys willing to COMPLETELY change the dynamics and structure of government, overthrow the status quo and establish the rights of all citizens to 'Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness', in the context of the 18th Century, anything REMOTELY defined as Conservative?

which is it? I'm guessing stupid, based on the bulk of your posts, but mental issues can't be ruled out.....

Here ya see folks...whut I been sayin...see how they do it...name calling..word substitution...and a bit of a subject change...and when that don't work...just get louder and more accusatory....Do ya see how frustrated he's gettin?

I particularly like this one:

I'm guessing stupid, based on the bulk of your posts, but mental issues can't be ruled out

Old Pudfark sez: " Yes, you are guessing...stupid "

[callmeslick]

answer the question, Pud. You made the comment about the nation being founded by Conservatives.
It wasn't. Are you that stupid, or just making wacky stuff up?

[callmeslick]

...This country was founded by conservatives

new sig quote. Thanks.

[Pudfark]

Slick...I start a whole new thread on that quote...same words...just fer you...have you over looked it?

Old Pudfark sez: " sum folks is just to preoccupied with theirselves.. "

[Pudfark]

Slick, I see you have read the new thread.....and by your reply there...I acknowledge your tacit agreement, publicly...

Old Pudfark sez: " Ya got real definition now "

[callmeslick]

reading a stupid remark does not equate to agreeing with it. You are a dimwitted liar, nothing changed for me, overnight, nor is it likely to.