Applause!
- callmeslick
 - Posts: 16473
 - Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
 - Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
 
Re: Applause!
America-hating site....just look at the linkage. Good to see that Pud admits he is on board with fellow Anti-Americans.
			
			
									
						
							- Reservoir_Dog
 - Posts: 8858
 - Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
 - Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.
 
Re: Applause!
callmeslick wrote:America-hating site....just look at the linkage. Good to see that Pud admits he is on board with fellow Anti-Americans.
- callmeslick
 - Posts: 16473
 - Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
 - Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
 
Re: Applause!
oh, and from their manifesto:
"...though often maligned (typically by those frustrated by an inability to engage in ad hominem attacks) anonymous speech has a long and storied history in the united states. used by the likes of mark twain (aka samuel langhorne clemens) to criticize common ignorance, and perhaps most famously by alexander hamilton, james madison and john jay (aka publius) to write the federalist papers, we think ourselves in good company in using one or another nom de plume. particularly in light of an emerging trend against vocalizing public dissent in the united states, we believe in the critical importance of anonymity and its role in dissident speech. like the economist magazine, we also believe that keeping authorship anonymous moves the focus of discussion to the content of speech and away from the speaker- as it should be. we believe not only that you should be comfortable with anonymous speech in such an environment, but that you should be suspicious of any speech that isn't."
except, folks, that Mark Twain was NOT anonymous(he was a celebrity, and a wealthy one), and neither were the Federalist authors. In other words, these folks use anonymity the way Pud and Slappy use it: to rant about things they don't come close to knowing, and spread utter bullshit. Sort of an economic version of Breitbart, which is to say garbage(and I'm being REAL charitable here).
			
			
									
						
							"...though often maligned (typically by those frustrated by an inability to engage in ad hominem attacks) anonymous speech has a long and storied history in the united states. used by the likes of mark twain (aka samuel langhorne clemens) to criticize common ignorance, and perhaps most famously by alexander hamilton, james madison and john jay (aka publius) to write the federalist papers, we think ourselves in good company in using one or another nom de plume. particularly in light of an emerging trend against vocalizing public dissent in the united states, we believe in the critical importance of anonymity and its role in dissident speech. like the economist magazine, we also believe that keeping authorship anonymous moves the focus of discussion to the content of speech and away from the speaker- as it should be. we believe not only that you should be comfortable with anonymous speech in such an environment, but that you should be suspicious of any speech that isn't."
except, folks, that Mark Twain was NOT anonymous(he was a celebrity, and a wealthy one), and neither were the Federalist authors. In other words, these folks use anonymity the way Pud and Slappy use it: to rant about things they don't come close to knowing, and spread utter bullshit. Sort of an economic version of Breitbart, which is to say garbage(and I'm being REAL charitable here).
- 
				Pudfark
 
Re: Applause!
And funnier still...there's R_D...lick'n Slick's empty sack.....again.
Re: Applause!
Couldn't be said in a more accurate way.Pudfark wrote:And funnier still...there's R_D...lick'n Slick's empty sack.....again.
Nic

Re: Applause!
It's funny how slick prentends that he actually believes that anyone could be anonymous on the interweb.
Nic
			
			
									
						
							Nic

- callmeslick
 - Posts: 16473
 - Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
 - Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
 
Re: Applause!
I sure you DO dislike those that hate fascists. Quite sure.HappyHappy wrote:We dislike Fascist haters, therefore we dislike the two of you.
HH