He can not, he is a Minion of the Fascist Communist eliteDarkhorse wrote:be your own man for once.
that dictate policy within his beloved "Democratic" party.
Best he can muster is to copy and paste.
HH
He can not, he is a Minion of the Fascist Communist eliteDarkhorse wrote:be your own man for once.
Not only do I have friends in Northern Nevada/Southeastern Oregon I have family there (my nephew was one of the horseback riders you saw on the news) I grew up on a 6000 acre cattle ranch and we leased many times that acreage from the BLM,USFS, corporate and private parties. I know how it all works!callmeslick wrote:having quite a few friends out that way(and up to Idaho), most people(including ranchers) support the BLM on this one. The guy in question is viewed as a selfish free-loader, unwilling to follow rules that have worked for decades.
his owned property isn't that much, nor are his financial assets, beyond the cattle. The personal gain thing is purely idiotic. How, exactly, will Reid gain from BLM land, that is designated as the home for an endangered species, in the middle of nowhere?Darkhorse wrote:Ya, spin that shit Slick! A lean on his property would have gotten the Government payed at some point. The only reason for the armed assault was Reid wants that land now for his own personal gain. A couple of days prior Reid's little bitch became the head of the BLM. Read the links I posted, you cannot get any closer than the local papers and people! Step away from the kool aid and look past the party rhetoric and you will see what is going on, be your own man for once.callmeslick wrote:anyone who actually followed the whole story knows that the government patiently waited YEARS to go through every court imaginable with this process.
And, still, the 'rancher' chose to illegally use public land. The only 'heavy-handed' response was to round up the cattle and get them off the land. The folks who made the situation potentially dangerous were the gun-toting loons that showed up in Bundy's defense.
You know this how? Do you have a clue how much land he owns or what the market value is? I doubt it, just more spin!callmeslick wrote:his owned property isn't that much, nor are his financial assets, beyond the cattle.
It is not BLM land - regardless of the BLM’s — and by extension, the Obama administration’s — insistence that Nevada’s land was ceded to the federal government when Nevada became a state in 1864, the Constitution, common law, and relevant Supreme Court rulings have found otherwise. The bottom line, then, is that Nevada owns the land where Cliven Bundy’s cattle fed, and Bundy — who has preemptive rights for his cattle to feed there — has faithfully and fully paid that landlord the rent he owed it.callmeslick wrote:The personal gain thing is purely idiotic. How, exactly, will Reid gain from BLM land, that is designated as the home for an endangered species, in the middle of nowhere?
Bundy owns around 150 acres of his own(not very much), he grazes on 1200 public acres. Market value of his own land is less than $250,000.Darkhorse wrote:You know this how? Do you have a clue how much land he owns or what the market value is? I doubt it, just more spin!callmeslick wrote:his owned property isn't that much, nor are his financial assets, beyond the cattle.
callmeslick wrote:The personal gain thing is purely idiotic. How, exactly, will Reid gain from BLM land, that is designated as the home for an endangered species, in the middle of nowhere?
how come every court decided otherwise? And over a half-dozen courts have heard this case.....It is not BLM land - regardless of the BLM’s — and by extension, the Obama administration’s — insistence that Nevada’s land was ceded to the federal government when Nevada became a state in 1864, the Constitution, common law, and relevant Supreme Court rulings have found otherwise. The bottom line, then, is that Nevada owns the land where Cliven Bundy’s cattle fed, and Bundy — who has preemptive rights for his cattle to feed there — has faithfully and fully paid that landlord the rent he owed it.
callmeslick wrote: Bundy owns around 150 acres of his own(not very much), he grazes on 1200 public acres. Market value of his own land is less than $250,000.
that was his claim in a court filing, Pud. I found the number a bit low, but figured he might lease other private land someplace.Pudfark wrote:callmeslick wrote: Bundy owns around 150 acres of his own(not very much), he grazes on 1200 public acres. Market value of his own land is less than $250,000.900 cows grazing on 1350 acres
![]()
Old Pudfark sez: " Most folks crap a turd....Slick shits diamonds. "
callmeslick wrote:that was his claim in a court filing, Pud. I found the number a bit low, but figured he might lease other private land someplace.Pudfark wrote:callmeslick wrote: Bundy owns around 150 acres of his own(not very much), he grazes on 1200 public acres. Market value of his own land is less than $250,000.900 cows grazing on 1350 acres
![]()
Old Pudfark sez: " Most folks crap a turd....Slick shits diamonds. "