Billary for President?????

User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: Billary for President?????

Post by callmeslick »

I hate to steal Res' material, but GOD, YOU ARE AN IDIOT! The poll was conducted BY the U of Pennsylvania, along with others, as the article states. The folks questioned, if you go to the source linking, were taken from across the nation, with standard demographic poll processes. In other words, a VERY scientifc poll, with a margin of error less than 3%(stated in the original article).

In other words, it was clearly NOT a poll limited to Pennsylvanians, you would have known, Pud, IF YOU COULD JUST READ.





Pudfark wrote: No one reads around here. Why? I won't stand for it.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
User avatar
Reservoir_Dog
Posts: 8858
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.

Re: Billary for President?????

Post by Reservoir_Dog »

callmeslick wrote:I hate to steal Res' material, but GOD, YOU ARE AN IDIOT!
Rest easy, you didn't steal my material. (that's Nappy-Boy's job)
What I usually say is, "Fuck, you're stupid".
Pudfark

Re: Billary for President?????

Post by Pudfark »

callmeslick wrote:I hate to steal Res' material, but GOD, YOU ARE AN IDIOT! The poll was conducted BY the U of Pennsylvania, along with others, as the article states. The folks questioned, if you go to the source linking, were taken from across the nation, with standard demographic poll processes. In other words, a VERY scientifc poll, with a margin of error less than 3%(stated in the original article).

In other words, it was clearly NOT a poll limited to Pennsylvanians, you would have known, Pud, IF YOU COULD JUST READ.





Pudfark wrote: No one reads around here. Why? I won't stand for it.
It ain't in the link you provided.... :lol:
Perhaps...you should add the other link...next time. ;)
Like others do.... 8-)
I still call B.S. cuz nowhere in the link provided by you does it say " were taken from across the nation, with standard demographic poll processes. In other words, a VERY scientifc poll, with a margin of error less than 3%(stated in the original article)." Remember, you're known to make things up..around here. B.S. it is.
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: Billary for President?????

Post by callmeslick »

Res is right, you ARE stupid. Since when does the Wall Street Journal publish polls of one state's opinion on national issues?
oh, and Res, in regards to your observation.
My dog is brighter, and I'm the first to admit, the dog isn't all that bright......












then again, he eats well, sleeps in climate controlled conditions on my mattress, hasn't worked a day in his life and has a membership to an Australian Football team, so maybe the dog is brighter than I give him credit for. Not so much so, Pud.... :lol:
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
Pudfark

Re: Billary for President?????

Post by Pudfark »

callmeslick wrote:Res is right, you ARE stupid. Since when does the Wall Street Journal publish polls of one state's opinion on national issues?
oh, and Res, in regards to your observation.
My dog is brighter, and I'm the first to admit, the dog isn't all that bright......













then again, he eats well, sleeps in climate controlled conditions on my mattress, hasn't worked a day in his life and has a membership to an Australian Football team, so maybe the dog is brighter than I give him credit for. Not so much so, Pud.... :lol:
Here ya go dummy....your laughable supporting info came from an article in the Washington Post....not the link you posted from the UK. Yer a lyin' ass wipe. Two totally different sources and you posted one link and claim they're the same. Good job Slick, everybody can see you "checked yer facts" and chose to deliberately falsely post them.

If'n ya like...I can do a little cut n pastey, prove it and shove my words above, six feet up'n yer tail pipe. :mrgreen:
Pudfark

Re: Billary for President?????

Post by Pudfark »

No surprise here in you suddenly logging off. :lol:
User avatar
Reservoir_Dog
Posts: 8858
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.

Re: Billary for President?????

Post by Reservoir_Dog »

Pudfark wrote:No surprise here in you suddenly logging off. :lol:
Ever heard of something called "supper time" or "dinner", Pud? :roll:
Pudfark

Re: Billary for President?????

Post by Pudfark »

Yes I have....so, why are you here?
Is it send in the "clowns" time for you?
Or, did ya volunteer?
Pudfark

Re: Billary for President?????

Post by Pudfark »

I'll be back a little later...time fer some maintenance on my Insurgency server.
Pudfark

Re: Billary for President?????

Post by Pudfark »

callmeslick wrote:I hate to steal Res' material, but GOD, YOU ARE AN IDIOT! The poll was conducted BY the U of Pennsylvania, along with others, as the article states. The folks questioned, if you go to the source linking, were taken from across the nation, with standard demographic poll processes. In other words, a VERY scientifc poll, with a margin of error less than 3%(stated in the original article).

In other words, it was clearly NOT a poll limited to Pennsylvanians, you would have known, Pud, IF YOU COULD JUST READ.





Pudfark wrote: No one reads around here. Why? I won't stand for it.
If you could just do the math. :lol:
20 people from each of the 50 states ain't no poll, not anywhere and it sure ain't no election and for certain it ain't representative of nuthin. Despite yer assertion that a few college kids could make 20 random phone calls to each state...and that there was a less than 3% error...either way. Laughable :lol: Edit: I see you've returned. :D
Post Reply