more polling

User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: more polling

Post by callmeslick »

not true.......sorry Pud.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
Pudfark

Re: more polling

Post by Pudfark »

callmeslick wrote:not true.......sorry Pud.
It is true.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dP_fa-FqT_c

Listen and watch the broadcast. 8-)

Do yer own homework from now on. :roll:
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: more polling

Post by callmeslick »

they've applied for that. Not a done deal, it has to pass government approval. By the way, my provider asked for a 5% average bump. Submissions had to be in by July 15, nothing will be set until Sept 1, no matter what your video states.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
Pudfark

Re: more polling

Post by Pudfark »

Let's see now.... I linked ya to the truth and I linked a vid to the actual broadcast to it.

You say it ain't the truth. I say it is. You have no link to anything. But, you say both links are lies.
Then you throw out gibberish and leave.

Sounds like a high school drop out to me...
What's really funny to me?
"it has to pass government approval." If it don't, there won't be any insurance for those folks and/or
they'll have to go completely through the application process again, if they "legally" can/is permissible under ObamaCare at this time ?
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: more polling

Post by callmeslick »

no one's rates can be(by law) set yet. Sorry. Failed again.

Further, you don't live in New York, so why are you whining about Obamacare again. If 80% of all people still like it this time next year, what will you complain about then?

by the way, and worth noting: the video purports to be about the experience of ONE FAMILY. No details about whether the increase was due to lowered subsidy, or actual policy costs before subsidies. Nothing. I call BS, and it's obvious BS at that.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
Pudfark

Re: more polling

Post by Pudfark »

Seems ya forgot about this in the original link. "WHEC stated that the increase is due to the fact that the “bulk” of individuals who signed up through the exchange are “older” and have pre-existing conditions, making them more expensive to cover."

So, ya lying "douche bag" it's affecting far more than one person... :roll:
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: more polling

Post by callmeslick »

sorry, but the data from around here(my provider, by the way) cite the same factors as raising costs a whopping 2%. You're still flinging BS, and whining about stuff that doesn't even affect you. Why?
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
Pudfark

Re: more polling

Post by Pudfark »

callmeslick wrote:sorry, but the data from around here(my provider, by the way) cite the same factors as raising costs a whopping 2%. You're still flinging BS, and whining about stuff that doesn't even affect you. Why?
thanx fer sharing yer "data"..... :lol:
Post Reply