Debating at the special Olympics
- 
				HappyHappy
 
Debating at the special Olympics
Yep, rational discussion has never been a stronk point here at ACWOS.
make a point, post a link and the tards (Commieshit and RD) are there with
insult. No matter how legitimate your link or how powerful your argument
they hurl shit and insult or complane about spellink.
Note to Commieshit, mist spellink is intensunal in dis post.
Pudster has da too of U by da ballz, neider uf U lissen to resun.
But it is so much fun slapping you two tards REAL HARD.
This tard fight makes my day, every day.
Give em HELL Pud.
HH
Oh yes, a momument to Commieshit's "honesty" is posted in my signature.
I get a big laugh every time I read it.
			
			
									
						
										
						make a point, post a link and the tards (Commieshit and RD) are there with
insult. No matter how legitimate your link or how powerful your argument
they hurl shit and insult or complane about spellink.
Note to Commieshit, mist spellink is intensunal in dis post.
Pudster has da too of U by da ballz, neider uf U lissen to resun.
But it is so much fun slapping you two tards REAL HARD.
This tard fight makes my day, every day.
Give em HELL Pud.
HH
Oh yes, a momument to Commieshit's "honesty" is posted in my signature.
I get a big laugh every time I read it.
- callmeslick
 - Posts: 16473
 - Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
 - Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
 
Re: Debating at the special Olympics
not historically accurate, and note that Happy doesn't even find spelling a strong point.HappyHappy wrote:Yep, rational discussion has never been a stronk point here at ACWOS.
you have been, repeatedly, asked to define terms(Communist, for one), clarify what you mean, contribute something past blind hate, back up claims with facts.make a point, post a link and the tards (Commieshit and RD) are there with
insult. No matter how legitimate your link or how powerful your argument
they hurl shit and insult or complane about spellink.
You have done none of that. Quit whining, Asswipe.
- Reservoir_Dog
 - Posts: 8858
 - Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
 - Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.
 
Re: Debating at the special Olympics
HappyHappy wrote:make a point, post a link and the tards (Commieshit and RD) are there with
insult. No matter how legitimate your link or how powerful your argument they hurl shit and insult
Here's a legitimate link fer ya, Nappy!
viewtopic.php?f=19&t=5010
- callmeslick
 - Posts: 16473
 - Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
 - Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
 
Re: Debating at the special Olympics
yup, a good summary of his 'contributions', Res.
Moreover, he REALLY shows his ass when he says that ACWOS has always been devoid of skilled debaters. Hell, back in the day, we had a forum for long-form debate ONLY(it was called Civilization or some such, Tolwyn could help my memory, no doubt). That the right leaning part of the debate panels got replaced by Happy The Clown and Barney Fife wasn't my doing, or yours.
			
			
									
						
							Moreover, he REALLY shows his ass when he says that ACWOS has always been devoid of skilled debaters. Hell, back in the day, we had a forum for long-form debate ONLY(it was called Civilization or some such, Tolwyn could help my memory, no doubt). That the right leaning part of the debate panels got replaced by Happy The Clown and Barney Fife wasn't my doing, or yours.
- Reservoir_Dog
 - Posts: 8858
 - Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
 - Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.
 
Re: Debating at the special Olympics
Man, those days are long gone.callmeslick wrote:Moreover, he REALLY shows his ass when he says that ACWOS has always been devoid of skilled debaters. Hell, back in the day, we had a forum for long-form debate ONLY(it was called Civilization or some such, Tolwyn could help my memory, no doubt).
I remember back in the day when a political conversation in CWoS could go on for 15 pages without a harsh insult ever being spoken.
Politics, religion, gun control, the price of gas ... you name it. Debaters would go on for pages and pages actually debating. And there would be input from a dozen different people in the same thread.
And the less serious threads were no different. Some random thread about a cat or a really bad movie or someone who got too drunk on the weekend would take on a life of it's own and go on for 10 pages. Of course, that was back in the day when CWoS had humor it. There is no humor or silliness in CWoS any more.
Yup, those days are looooooooooong gone.
- 
				Pudfark
 
Re: Debating at the special Olympics
My favorite debate/de bait...particularly, when it's slick.Reservoir_Dog wrote:pussy
- 
				HappyHappy
 
Re: Debating at the special Olympics
RD and Commieshit = Tweedledum and Tweedledummer......
But at times it's fun to watch a TARD FIGHT!
But they are really stupid!
How can such marginal sub human scum type?
HH
			
			
									
						
										
						But at times it's fun to watch a TARD FIGHT!
But they are really stupid!
How can such marginal sub human scum type?
HH
- callmeslick
 - Posts: 16473
 - Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
 - Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
 
Re: Debating at the special Olympics
HappyHappy wrote:dweezle, blurp,blurp. Here's another pantload of shit from my feeble mind. I blew an orderly tonight!
- 
				Pudfark
 
Re: Debating at the special Olympics
Debating at the special Olympics
Slick...came in third, right behind Helen Keller.
			
			
									
						
										
						Slick...came in third, right behind Helen Keller.
- callmeslick
 - Posts: 16473
 - Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
 - Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.