CallinSick
-
Pudfark
Re: CallinSick
OBAMA NEVER HAS A PLAN
On Thursday, President Obama held a press conference in which he humiliated himself entirely on the question of America’s handling of the terror group ISIS. Explaining that he had to consult Congress and check the pulse of Americans, Obama stated, “I don’t want to put the cart before the horse. We don’t have a strategy yet.”
Which begs the question: what the hell does this guy do for a living?
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2014 ... has-a-plan
Old Pudfark sez: " Even fer Slick....there's too many turds in Obama's sandbox.... "
On Thursday, President Obama held a press conference in which he humiliated himself entirely on the question of America’s handling of the terror group ISIS. Explaining that he had to consult Congress and check the pulse of Americans, Obama stated, “I don’t want to put the cart before the horse. We don’t have a strategy yet.”
Which begs the question: what the hell does this guy do for a living?
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2014 ... has-a-plan
Old Pudfark sez: " Even fer Slick....there's too many turds in Obama's sandbox.... "
- callmeslick
- Posts: 16473
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
- Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
Re: CallinSick
umm, what he said is perfectly reasonable. Unless Congress comes up with a clear plan for the region, all he has is the ability to execute military measures. That is NOT a plan, something a lot of people apparently fail to grasp. It is up to Congress, who has been dithering since before the Syrian problem got bad at making ANY committment to a long-term plan(that might extend beyond Presidential terms). Who better than to start working on a plan than, say, John McCain, which one can locate pictures of with ISIS leaders from a year and a half back.
-
Pudfark
Re: CallinSick
That makes no sense and ain't factually correct. That's like saying the Normandy Invasion hinged on the plan submitted by NCO's. In other words....the Commander in Chief isn't responsible for a plan or direction and it's execution.... Will your theory be applied to "immigration"? What's really laughable? You point at congress....when harry reid and the senate shit can everything the congress passes and then Obama is on permanent ignore.callmeslick wrote:umm, what he said is perfectly reasonable. Unless Congress comes up with a clear plan for the region, all he has is the ability to execute military measures. That is NOT a plan, something a lot of people apparently fail to grasp. It is up to Congress, who has been dithering since before the Syrian problem got bad at making ANY committment to a long-term plan(that might extend beyond Presidential terms). Who better than to start working on a plan than, say, John McCain, which one can locate pictures of with ISIS leaders from a year and a half back.
I agree with ya....that if this ain't Obama's "job", we don't need Obama.
- callmeslick
- Posts: 16473
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
- Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
Re: CallinSick
um, no, it DOES suggest that the Normandy Invasion was planned LONG after we'd settled on a strategy vs Germany and Japan, and joined a coalition with defined roles and goals. We wouldn't have been near Normandy had Congress not changed our neutrality policy. Once again, you display an alarming lack of understanding about how your system of government work, how your military actions are put into place and deemed acceptable, or the basic roles of Commander-in-Chief in the whole mix. Attaboy, another low-information voter!!Pudfark wrote:That makes no sense and ain't factually correct. That's like saying the Normandy Invasion hinged on the plan submitted by NCO's.
- Reservoir_Dog
- Posts: 8858
- Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
- Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.
Re: CallinSick
What's REALLY scary .... is that you probably actually believe that!HappyHappy wrote:Osama Obama already has a plan.
He is an Islamic mole.
- callmeslick
- Posts: 16473
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
- Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
-
Pudfark
Re: CallinSick
callmeslick wrote:um, no, it DOES suggest that the Normandy Invasion was planned LONG after we'd settled on a strategy vs Germany and Japan, and joined a coalition with defined roles and goals. We wouldn't have been near Normandy had Congress not changed our neutrality policy. Once again, you display an alarming lack of understanding about how your system of government work, how your military actions are put into place and deemed acceptable, or the basic roles of Commander-in-Chief in the whole mix. Attaboy, another low-information voter!!Pudfark wrote:That makes no sense and ain't factually correct. That's like saying the Normandy Invasion hinged on the plan submitted by NCO's.
Check the mirror out to see where/wear yer "stupid" remarks.....belong.
Old Pudfark sez: " Seems like that noise I'm hearing from you? Is the sound of my statement, whoooooooshing over yer head.... "
- callmeslick
- Posts: 16473
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
- Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
Re: CallinSick
you're an idiot. Your statements regarding Non Commissioned Officers make no sense. Which, of course, we've come to expect from you. 