The beginning of the end? or The end of the beginning?

[Pudfark]

well, that settles that.

Not quite.
There's still fun to be had and more lies to be told.

fixored.

[Reservoir_Dog]

Interesting.
Dawg has gone silent in this thread ever since I posted verification of the authenticity of my sig quotes (that he asked for) even though he has dropped into CWoS every day since I posted it.
I guess he doesn't like admitting when he's wrong. Especially to me.

But that's okay, he's got his new bitch girlfriend Pud trying to defend him in his absence.

[Pudfark]

Interesting.
Dawg has gone silent in this thread ever since I posted prevarication of the authenticity of my sig quotes (that he asked for) even though he has dropped into CWoS every day since I posted it.
I guess he doesn't like admitting when he's wrong. Especially to me.

But that's okay, he's got his new bitch girlfriend Pud trying to defend him in his absence.

[Dawg]

Interesting.
Dawg has gone silent in this thread ever since I posted verification of the authenticity of my sig quotes (that he asked for) even though he has dropped into CWoS every day since I posted it.
I guess he doesn't like admitting when he's wrong. Especially to me.

But that's okay, he's got his new bitch girlfriend Pud trying to defend him in his absence.

blow me?

res, you are utterly pathetic, and I'm being kind.

sorry, I didn't come back to whatever bait I'd dropped, thanks for getting spooled up. Really even more predictable than I remember.

dawg 1
res zero

[HappyHappy]

Commieshit is pathetic, RD makes pathetic look like a compliment.

Interesting.
Dawg has gone silent in this thread ever since I posted verification of the authenticity of my sig quotes (that he asked for) even though he has dropped into CWoS every day since I posted it.
I guess he doesn't like admitting when he's wrong. Especially to me.

But that's okay, he's got his new bitch girlfriend Pud trying to defend him in his absence.

blow me?

res, you are utterly pathetic, and I'm being kind.

sorry, I didn't come back to whatever bait I'd dropped, thanks for getting spooled up. Really even more predictable than I remember.

dawg 1
res zero

[Reservoir_Dog]

Interesting.
Dawg has gone silent in this thread ever since I posted verification of the authenticity of my sig quotes (that he asked for) even though he has dropped into CWoS every day since I posted it.
I guess he doesn't like admitting when he's wrong. Especially to me.

But that's okay, he's got his new bitch girlfriend Pud trying to defend him in his absence.

blow me?

res, you are utterly pathetic, and I'm being kind.

sorry, I didn't come back to whatever bait I'd dropped, thanks for getting spooled up. Really even more predictable than I remember.

dawg 1
res zero

Let me see if I've got this straight.
You accused me of fabricating sig quotes. I proved beyond any doubt that my sig quotes are accurate and not fabricated. You ran and hid. And now you come back and resort to deflection rather than address the fact that I proved you wrong.
And in typical Pud mode you're claiming some sort of victory.
I'm right. You're wrong. Suck it up, bitch.

[Pudfark]

R_D....it's difficult to call ya a 'blowhard' when ya suck.....so bad.

Old Pudfark sez: " The only thing you've proved? You can pull over 100 inches of manifold pressure. "

[Pudfark]

8 DESPERATION MOVES FROM DEMOCRATS THAT SHOW THEY'LL BE CRUSHED ON TUESDAY

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government ... tion-Plays

Old Pudfark sez: " a common denominator.... "

[HappyHappy]

8 DESPERATION MOVES FROM DEMOCRATS THAT SHOW THEY'LL BE CRUSHED ON TUESDAY

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government ... tion-Plays

Old Pudfark sez: " a common denominator.... "

Funny how Commieshit uses the "Democratic" talking points
to the letter. He calls us "haters", he calls all scandals "old news"
and dismisses argument as "racism" or the previously mentioned haters.

The only way he will slither back in here in the near future is
if his beloved Fascists score an upset.

[callmeslick]

wrong, Slappy-boy! I'll be here, speaking the truth, when the spirit moves me. Which isn't often, because there is no intellect to argue with.
As for my current view, I think it is going to be a very reactive election. Which, on the Senate side, is good for the Republicans. They should get enough seats to retake the Senate, largely knocking out shakier Dems who came in with the 2008 Obama wave. However, at the House and Governor levels, I think you'll see a larger than usual number of incumbants lose, which should spell some gains for Dems. So, we get a few states governed better after Tea Party fuckups ran them, more gridlock in Congress, and everything gets into gear for 2016, when all the Tea Party Senators are up for re-election, with even more Republican governors.