Since Obama was first elected, Democrats have lost at least 14 Senate seats. (Louisiana is another likely loss.) The party has lost more than 70 seats in the House, and will field its smallest caucus in the next Congress since before FDR. Only 18 states have Democrat governors, compared to 29 states when Obama took office. Around 1,000 state legislative seats have shifted to the Republicans. The GOP will control 68 of the nation's 99 state legislative chambers, again the largest disparity since before FDR.
Republicans won the governors' mansions in Illinois, Massachusetts, and Maryland, as well as holding almost all of its current seats. The GOP captured the New Mexico House, the Senates in Colorado, New York, Maine, and Washington. The party swept both chambers in Nevada. It made gains in almost every state.
Politically, all the gains Democrats have made over the past 80 years have been reversed in just 6 years. Suspend science for a bit. If someone went into a coma in the 1920s and woke up today, the political balance of power would be roughly the same across the country as it was then.
The losses of the last six years present Democrats with an enormous challenge. The current belief by many Democrats that Hillary Clinton will be their nominee in 2016 may be based on little more than the realization that the party has no other real option.
When Hillary Clinton eventually exits the national stage, Democrats will face a long process of building a credible roster of candidates for national office. By contrast, probably around a dozen major Republican candidates can make compelling cases for a presidential run. This is the position into which the left has driven the Democrat party.
The modern Democrat party is far better at rallying opposition than governing. Its eight-year run of being in power reversed all its recent and even long-term gains. It is currently in a worse position with the electorate than anyone alive can probably remember. With the November 4 election, the party is now safely back in its comfort zone of opposition.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government ... crat-Party
R_D, this why Slick and the Democrat Party have gone from 'wag the dog'.....to 'gone fishing', for the next several decades. Gonna be interesting watching y'all finance 'Keystone'...with oil around 80 bucks a barrel? Who knows....maybe 'Hypoid' Mary Landrieu will get her bill passed today?
A summary for R_D
- Reservoir_Dog
- Posts: 8858
- Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
- Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.
Re: A summary for R_D
What makes you think that I give a shit about any of that?
-
Pudfark
Re: A summary for R_D
Caring is a sign of intelligence.
Commenting all the time about what...you know naught...that's Canadian and that's ewe.
Though...after a few 'rough rides'? You might care about that oil? When you do...have to give a shit.
Commenting all the time about what...you know naught...that's Canadian and that's ewe.
Though...after a few 'rough rides'? You might care about that oil? When you do...have to give a shit.
- Reservoir_Dog
- Posts: 8858
- Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
- Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.
- Reservoir_Dog
- Posts: 8858
- Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
- Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.
Re: A summary for R_D
That's pretty funny coming from the world heavyweight champion of copy and paste.Pudfark wrote:Commenting all the time about what...you know naught...
-
Pudfark
- Reservoir_Dog
- Posts: 8858
- Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
- Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.
Re: A summary for R_D
My avatar symbolizes you and Nappy reading my posts.Pudfark wrote:You and yer crayons and avatar...illustrates, why yer the 'missing link'....R_D.
That's why I put it there.
