quite a contrast!

HappyHappy

Re: quite a contrast!

Post by HappyHappy »

TRUMP 2016
Pudfark

Re: quite a contrast!

Post by Pudfark »

callmeslick wrote:that has already been dismissed by the DOJ. Try again.
Please to reference this with an official statement from the DOJ and one from the FBI stating that their investigation is concluded.
Thank You
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: quite a contrast!

Post by callmeslick »

the only links even SUGGESTING perjury charges are from right-wing loons. However, the telling part is that there is ZERO evidence that anyone is even investigating testimony at all. Hard to get charges when the DOJ isn't even investigating. I can link you to where they dismissed any thought of charges, and ended the investigation altogether about the email server back in August, if you'd missed that.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
Pudfark

Re: quite a contrast!

Post by Pudfark »

callmeslick wrote:the only links even SUGGESTING perjury charges are from right-wing loons. However, the telling part is that there is ZERO evidence that anyone is even investigating testimony at all. Hard to get charges when the DOJ isn't even investigating. I can link you to where they dismissed any thought of charges, and ended the investigation altogether about the email server back in August, if you'd missed that.
:lol: Here's what you're deliberately missing.

Hillary is currently being investigated by the FBI. The DOJ, isn't/doesn't. They're waiting for the FBI investigation to conclude, while Obama is stalling/undermining it, every way he can. Bottom line is this, Hillary testifies publicly under oath, Hillary's emails are published publicly and are in definite contradiction of her testimony....and that ain't lying to you? This ain't politics, it's a crime. So, yeah, link me buddy.... :)
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: quite a contrast!

Post by callmeslick »

the FBI is the investigative arm of the DOJ, Pud, just to clarify governmental organization for you. The FBI concluded, in August, the investigation of the email servers, as it directly related to Hillary, and announced that. There is no evidence that I can find that the are still investigating her for anything, at present.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
User avatar
Reservoir_Dog
Posts: 8858
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.

Re: quite a contrast!

Post by Reservoir_Dog »

Holy shit! Is Pud STILL blathering on about Hillary being charged with something? :lol: :lol: :lol:
HappyHappy

Re: quite a contrast!

Post by HappyHappy »

The Fascists are nervous... Fukkem.
Pudfark

Re: quite a contrast!

Post by Pudfark »

Reservoir_Dog wrote:Holy shit! Is Pud STILL blathering on about Hillary being charged with something? :lol: :lol: :lol:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/11 ... cmp=hplnws

:lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: quite a contrast!

Post by callmeslick »

Pud, are you aware that NOTHING on her email server was, at the time being discussed, CLASSIFIED at ALL, let alone 'highly classified'?
Keep swinging, you're missing big-time so far.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
Pudfark

Re: quite a contrast!

Post by Pudfark »

callmeslick wrote:Pud, are you aware that NOTHING on her email server was, at the time being discussed, CLASSIFIED at ALL, let alone 'highly classified'?
Keep swinging, you're missing big-time so far.
Yup, Slick, ignore the obvious...she wiped her server. Btw, yer currently in first place for the dumb ass award.
That there server wipe was illegal. Under federal law, she cannot destroy public property. Guess what dumb ass, they've found the evidence.
It don't matter if it was 'classified' at all or for that matter what it 'was' classified. She had a legal duty to return it, not delete it.

Oh, and btw again.....define "at the time being discussed"? Cuz, when I read that, it gave me a rib stitch.....from laughing.
Post Reply