Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case

Pudfark

Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case

Post by Pudfark »

Who cares?

I am beginning to think that the only thing Slick cares about in this thread is...."the end justifying the means".

Old Pudfark sez: " It's all bullshit, until you have to sweat or bleed "
Pudfark

Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case

Post by Pudfark »

I wonder? If, I made similar threat to Slick and family? Ya know, like the New Black Panthers did.....If Slick would start running around with his dress up over his head....immediately complaining to the moderator's and forum administration about what I said...then consulting a lawyer...prosecutor...the FCC...and NASA.......or would he say? Oh, nevermind, he's just being a goofball? (see other thread)

Old Pudfark sez: " Shoo/Shoe on the other foot... "
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case

Post by callmeslick »

If someone 'threatened' me like those yahoos I'd laugh my ass off. And then, yes, I'd take it to the feds. It should have been prosecuted, but, as I pointed out, the US Attorneys in this district aren't addressing a lot of voting irregularity cases, in Philly and in central PA(rightwingnuts threatened Obama supporters in some cases). I think I'm big enough to get over it, and smart enough to realize that it really didn't affect anyone's vote in this case.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
Pudfark

Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case

Post by Pudfark »

callmeslick wrote:If someone 'threatened' me like those yahoos I'd laugh my ass off. And then, yes, I'd take it to the feds. It should have been prosecuted, but, as I pointed out, the US Attorneys in this district aren't addressing a lot of voting irregularity cases, in Philly and in central PA(rightwingnuts threatened Obama supporters in some cases). I think I'm big enough to get over it, and smart enough to realize that it really didn't affect anyone's vote in this case.
Very patronizing of you...to go to the Fed's and to hell with everyone else....."CallmeShabazz"......

Old Pudark sez: " Hate crimes, terroristic threats and weapons don't affect folks...just ask "CallmeShabazz"?....."
ruggbutt
Posts: 2147
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:11 am

Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case

Post by ruggbutt »

Regardless of whether voters changed their vote is irrelevant. Whether they were intimidated might be relevant. The fact that the Black Panthers were there to attempt to intimidate the voters is the crime. You lefties bitched and moaned about hanging chads and not being able to read the ballot (which I saw and wasn't confused at all about) but when a bona fide case pops up like this you pooh-pooh it like nothing happened. Sorry Slick but the vid tells the story. Had that happened here in AZ I'd have told that fecker to get out of my face before he got hurt, then I'd have hurt the asshole for trying to block my constitutional rights. The problem with you is you don't think anything is a big deal unless it happens in your backyard. Your recent apology about how I've been correct about illegals and crime all along sets precedent for your attitude. Which is a shame cuz what happens in Chicago affects us here in AZ. What happened in NYC on 9/11 affected all of us. You aren't looking at the big picture, instead you're an apologist for your party.

When you get your shit together and you realize that politicians in general are fecking over the citizens then and only then will you be seen as a reasonable and intelligent human being. Which would be a far cry from the sheeple apologist that you appear to be right now.
Image
All the cool LOMAC stuff
Reservoir_Dog wrote:It's been a long time since she's cum
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case

Post by callmeslick »

the point(and the ONLY point) I am trying to get into this clusterfuck is this: There were two guys involved. Their entire 'movement' consists of maybe 400 people nationwide. They aren't, ever, going to influence a national election. Period. You cannot prosecute every thing that you should, or would in an ideal world with unlimited court time, money and resources. Fact is, this took place in Philadelphia, PA. Believe me, if those two had REALLY posed anything beyond a nuisance threat they would have be shot on the spot by the Philly cops. They got a local small-time charge and fine and that was that. For those of you who know Philadelphia,
you know what I'm saying. If it was serious, they wouldn't be here to discuss future behavior with anyone.

That said, the whole matter is trivial, in light of all the rest of our nation's problems. Really, really trivial. Any fool willing to call this a 'hot-button' issue either has their head up their ass to where they can clearly see their small intestines, or be stupid as a rock.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
HappyHappy

Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case

Post by HappyHappy »

As I see it Calmesick is a but dull.
He out posts all of us with nearly all of it political rehtoric and propaganda.

Since he is not the fastest ship in the fleet I decided to re-post this.
Maybe this time he will understand.

This one line says it all.

LMAO Sick, your BOY is using storm troops to enforce the vote and got caught!

========================================


It's about spin Callmesick, you spin it as to be
a mere minor political issue.
I see it in a totaly different light. I see it as Osama Obama's
storm troopers enforcing the vote.

Note that the only major US news organisation not seeing
this issue as newsworthy is
Commie News Network.
CNN seems to dislike risking an insult to their BOY.

"Civil Rights Panel to Renew Subpoenas, Pursue Federal Probe in Black Panther Case"

LMAO Sick, your BOY is using storm troops to enforce the vote and got caught!

A little throw back to the 1933 elections in Germany?

Sturmabteilung Obama style! Brown shirts with brown skin. :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

HH



PS: The only one supporting Callmesick is a homosexual un-employed Janitor from Vancouver.
Dike_O_Chew, your opinion ain't worth shit since you aint American.
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case

Post by callmeslick »

It must be nice, Sarge, having the summer off from school. Are you in 11th grade next year, or another whirl at 10th.


Good lord, you're a sorry spectacle. Storm troopers! w00t!! How is the weather on your planet?
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
Wullie

Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case

Post by Wullie »

callmeslick wrote:the point(and the ONLY point) I am trying to get into this clusterfuck is this: There were two guys involved. Their entire 'movement' consists of maybe 400 people nationwide. They aren't, ever, going to influence a national election. Period. You cannot prosecute every thing that you should, or would in an ideal world with unlimited court time, money and resources. Fact is, this took place in Philadelphia, PA. Believe me, if those two had REALLY posed anything beyond a nuisance threat they would have be shot on the spot by the Philly cops. They got a local small-time charge and fine and that was that. For those of you who know Philadelphia,
you know what I'm saying. If it was serious, they wouldn't be here to discuss future behavior with anyone.

That said, the whole matter is trivial, in light of all the rest of our nation's problems. Really, really trivial. Any fool willing to call this a 'hot-button' issue either has their head up their ass to where they can clearly see their small intestines, or be stupid as a rock.
Trivial?

Have you thought about having a glass belly button installed so maybe you can see better?

Maybe it would be better to just apologize for your people and then have group hug and sing Kum by ya?
ruggbutt
Posts: 2147
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:11 am

Re: Obama refuse to allow prosecution of voter intimidation case

Post by ruggbutt »

callmeslick wrote:They aren't, ever, going to influence a national election.
Are you sure? How about less than 400 influencing a state election?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/07 ... udy-finds/
Image
All the cool LOMAC stuff
Reservoir_Dog wrote:It's been a long time since she's cum
Post Reply