NOAA caught red handed falsifying climate change info

ruggbutt
Posts: 2147
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:11 am

NOAA caught red handed falsifying climate change info

Post by ruggbutt »

Image
All the cool LOMAC stuff
Reservoir_Dog wrote:It's been a long time since she's cum
Daiichidoku
Posts: 680
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 4:09 pm

Re: NOAA caught red handed falsifying climate change info

Post by Daiichidoku »

and how subtle a ruse, imbellishing the truth by several hunrded degrees farhenheit :roll:
Image
Pudfark

Re: NOAA caught red handed falsifying climate change info

Post by Pudfark »

"A beleaguered federal agency appears to be implicated in the most blatant and extreme case of climate data fraud yet seen. Official records have been confirmed as evidence that a handful of temperature records for the Great Lakes region have been hiked up by literally hundreds of degrees to substantially inflate the average temperature range for the northeastern United States."

I wonder, how many of them will go to jail for falsifying government documents? Oh, that's right, Obama don't prosecute the like minded........

Old Pudfark sez: " What is integrity? It's what conservatives have..........and..........what liberals want to buy. "
ruggbutt
Posts: 2147
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:11 am

Re: NOAA caught red handed falsifying climate change info

Post by ruggbutt »

Pudfark wrote: What is integrity?
That's the same thing that Rangel and Waters have been asking. Seems they have no clue what it is.
Image
All the cool LOMAC stuff
Reservoir_Dog wrote:It's been a long time since she's cum
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: NOAA caught red handed falsifying climate change info

Post by callmeslick »

you could read the paper that goes with it, if you want. The 'falsified' data is shown in the paper as to not be used in calculations, or to have any meaning at all. Those shaded boxes with the wierd numbers were readings when weather conditions prevented accurate functioning of the equipment used in the study.

what this is, is another example of where science is science, neither 'right' nor 'left', merely collecting data and studying it. When assclowns start interfering in the process for ANY political purpose(in this case to make a right-wing point that is yet another lie....attaboy, ruggie!), for ANY agenda, science suffers.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
ruggbutt
Posts: 2147
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:11 am

Re: NOAA caught red handed falsifying climate change info

Post by ruggbutt »

It's scientists getting caught falsifying data. Same thing happened not long ago with other global warming scientists. You remember the leaked e-mails and stuff don't ya? Actually, it doesn't matter if you do. You are in denial.
Image
All the cool LOMAC stuff
Reservoir_Dog wrote:It's been a long time since she's cum
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: NOAA caught red handed falsifying climate change info

Post by callmeslick »

ruggbutt wrote:It's scientists getting caught falsifying data. Same thing happened not long ago with other global warming scientists. You remember the leaked e-mails and stuff don't ya? Actually, it doesn't matter if you do. You are in denial.

you clearly don't understand science, or how it works, so best to stop now. Or, read the papers themselves, and not some political hack 'interpretation' of same.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
Pudfark

Re: NOAA caught red handed falsifying climate change info

Post by Pudfark »

Who chose to "present" the data?
ruggbutt
Posts: 2147
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:11 am

Re: NOAA caught red handed falsifying climate change info

Post by ruggbutt »

callmeslick wrote:you clearly don't understand science, or how it works
Funny thing is you don't. And you're supposed to be someone who works in that field. Explain how Antarctic ice is more prevalent than it has been in the last century when we have global warming. You can't, you're a dumbfuck of epic proportions.
Image
All the cool LOMAC stuff
Reservoir_Dog wrote:It's been a long time since she's cum
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: NOAA caught red handed falsifying climate change info

Post by callmeslick »

ruggbutt wrote: Explain how Antarctic ice is more prevalent than it has been in the last century when we have global warming. .

another bogus statistic, which counts as 'Antarctic Ice' massive chunks that are floating away from the continent. The intact continental ice mass has dropped by around 20% in the past 50 years, and average temps are up, within the ice core, dramatically.

On this note, I'll depart for the night. My grandson has just arrived for an evening with Grandpa and Grandma. He's all of 6 weeks old, and intellectually light years ahead of where you, Ruggie, have fallen to.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
Post Reply