Pudfark wrote:Now there's some reasoning....and while we are invading them...might as well annex them...I'm all for it.....that, plus the southern border fence would be a lot shorter.....and when we're done there, head up North and free Daii from Canadian enslavement.....About time you came around, Slick.....callmeslick wrote:wouldn't it be more effective to target the cartels on their home base, as I've suggested for a few years?
Sure, there would be the predictable braying about 'sovereignity', but Mexico has clearly(long ago) lost all control over folks issuing threats to our citizens and elected officials.
Old Pudfark sez: " lots of new locations to build mosques "
Titor on the Rube, Ive said this more than once, mexico as a state instantly wipes out most or majorityif issues, albeit introducing new ones (but more readily surmountable)....and new small little southern border...just annex it ala anschluss (hell, call it greater texas while your at it)
even if you can find mythical canada, dont bother, what you guys dont lose from friendly fire events will be right fucked up by our lacrosse players armed with stale timbits....then we'll get mean and unleash the franch kanadians on your sorry asses; "'I one more time, mac, unclog my nose in your direction', sons of a window-dresser! So, you think you could out-clever us French folk with your silly knees-bent running about advancing behavior?! I wave my private parts at your aunties, you cheesy lot of second hand electric donkey-bottom biters"
(non-combatant kandians would all immediately report to immigration holding/detention area formerly for mexicans, in AZ and for cubans in florida, just prior to hostilites, and most are already staged in those respective states patiently waiting for the go word)
and it was a fun read....+1
