Re: Maybe Obama should sit down with the Swiss.
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:11 am
LOL, you gonna tell me the press just made it up? How's life behind those blinders?callmeslick wrote:ruggbutt wrote:
what list?? More paranoid lunacy
Sublime Opinions of the Masses (give or take a few)
https://acompletewasteofspace.com/
LOL, you gonna tell me the press just made it up? How's life behind those blinders?callmeslick wrote:ruggbutt wrote:
what list?? More paranoid lunacy
That's okay, Dawg. But feel free to come up here again and take advantage of our good old fashioned Canadian health care.Dawg wrote:You realize less than 1/64th of one half percent of Americans give a flip what Canadians think?
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/09 ... lth-plans/callmeslick wrote:so, Cuda.....list the contributions to this process by the GOP. I'm all ears.
OBAMA: "I will not sign a plan that adds one dime to our deficits either now or in the future. Period."
THE FACTS: Though there's no final plan yet, the White House and congressional Democrats already have shown they're ready to skirt the no-new-deficits pledge.
House Democrats offered a bill that the Congressional Budget Office said would add $220 billion to the deficit over 10 years. But Democrats and Obama administration officials claimed the bill actually was deficit-neutral. They said they simply didn't have to count $245 billion of it -- the cost of adjusting Medicare reimbursement rates so physicians don't face big annual pay cuts.
Their reasoning was that they already had decided to exempt this "doc fix" from congressional rules that require new programs to be paid for. In other words, it doesn't have to be paid for because they decided it doesn't have to be paid for.
The administration also said that since Obama already had included the doctor payment in his 10-year budget proposal, it didn't have to be counted again.
That aside, the long-term prognosis for costs of the health care legislation has not been good.
CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf had this to say in July: "We do not see the sort of fundamental changes that would be necessary to reduce the trajectory of federal health spending by a significant amount."
OBAMA: "Don't pay attention to those scary stories about how your benefits will be cut. ... That will never happen on my watch. I will protect Medicare."
THE FACTS: Obama and congressional Democrats want to pay for their health care plans in part by reducing Medicare payments to providers by more than $500 billion over 10 years. The cuts would largely hit hospitals and Medicare Advantage, the part of the Medicare program operated through private insurance companies.
Although wasteful spending in Medicare is widely acknowledged, many experts believe some seniors almost certainly would see reduced benefits from the cuts. That's particularly true for the 25 percent of Medicare users covered through Medicare Advantage.
Supporters contend that providers could absorb the cuts by improving how they operate and wouldn't have to reduce benefits or pass along costs. But there's certainly no guarantee they wouldn't.
heh thats also in the DNC handbook, "Facts dont matter. its all about how we feel"ruggbutt wrote:You can't just post facts here, Slick will remain steadfast (with blinders on) and say that the Emperor has clothes.
callmeslick wrote:so, Cuda.....list the contributions to this process by the GOP. I'm all ears.
And, Rugg: I ask again, what "list"?? Prove it.
Jumoschwanz wrote: