Page 2 of 4

Re: Positive "Change" version 2.0

Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 7:20 pm
by callmeslick
my point about Texas is this: despite piss-poor levels of social spending, and poor academic spending, Texas
has a huge deficit. Taxes seem to be pretty low, but there is a minimum level of government everyone still expects.....just doesn't look like Texans think they ought to pay for them.

As for the $14 trillion, which of you slow wits thinks I'm going to pay a smaller share of it than you?
Puhleaze.

Oh, and Cuda......nifty chart work, indeed! Kudos! Still, when you factor in stuff than no Congressional action impacted, like debt service, spending on Social Security, Medicare etc, that Pelosi et al didn't increase, no real uptick in the rate of growth is seen. The last things that really impacted the deficit was the stimulus package, which probably kept revenues from plummetting, so that was sort of necessary. Much of it was repaid or came back in the form of taxation, anyway. The last two items that altered the overall trajectory of growth were the addition of unfunded wars and the last major Medicare revision, both on the GOP congress' watch. Make what you will of that, but those are the facts.

Re: Positive "Change" version 2.0

Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 7:40 pm
by Buzz
Serious question Slick.


Are you ever wrong?

Re: Positive "Change" version 2.0

Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 8:02 pm
by HappyHappy
Arrogance, ideology and ego prevent Callmesick from ever being correct.
Hey, he even tried to spin the catastrophic loss of the house
by his beloved Democrats / communists into a win.
You are trying to reason with a moron (Callmesick).

"Winning aint everything, it's the only thing"

We won you lost Callmesick.

HH

Re: Positive "Change" version 2.0

Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 8:07 pm
by Reservoir_Dog
HappyHappy wrote:"Winning aint everything, it's the only thing"

We won you lost Callmesick.

HH
I remember you saying that very same thing on November 4, 2008. 8-)

Re: Positive "Change" version 2.0

Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 8:28 pm
by callmeslick
Buzz wrote:Serious question Slick.


Are you ever wrong?
serious answer:
sure, who isn't?

Re: Positive "Change" version 2.0

Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 8:54 pm
by Buzz
HappyHappy wrote: You are trying to reason with a moron (Callmesick).
HH

You have balls saying that to me.

That's what I thought about you in some of our discussions.

Re: Positive "Change" version 2.0

Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 6:14 am
by callmeslick
Buzz wrote:You have balls saying that to me.

That's what I thought about you in some of our discussions.

no balls on that boy, Buzz......it's just that your initial impression was accurate. :lol:

Re: Positive "Change" version 2.0

Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 8:45 am
by HappyHappy
This post was made by Reservoir_Dog who is currently on your ignore list. Display this post.
This post was made by callmeslick who is currently on your ignore list. Display this post.

Buzz, you can not prove the existance of a God that never existed no matter
how hard you dig your heels in. You got SMOKED in that thread.
Face it, the God myth is a Santaclause myth for adults.

The Democrats tax and spend myth is a Marxist myth for Democrats.
Spread the wealth around. Feed the failures in the inner city and let
em reproduce. Manufacture new Democratic voters to keep Pelosi and
her minions in power.

We won, you lost.
I like the sound of it!

HH

Re: Positive "Change" version 2.0

Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 8:48 am
by CUDA
well!!!! so much for being quiet around here. :lol:
HH wrote:I could while away the hours, conferrin' with the flowers
Consultin' with the rain.
And my head I'd be scratchin' while
my thoughts were busy hatchin'
If I only had a brain.

Re: Positive "Change" version 2.0

Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:12 am
by Buzz
Happy.............You must have a little voice in your head telling you you're a winner.

Pump up the meds.