Here's some more "nonsense" you're incapable of understanding...
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/12 ... uty-queen/
Oh...yeah...The same folks (ATF) who are gonna enforce the new Gun Laws you say you want...Who can't keep up with their own shit, lie about it and then lie again.
Come on Buzz read the whole link...Show off yer comprehension skills..
If'n ya don't get it? Maybe change yer name to "Patsy".
Well before banning the guns...
Re: Well before banning the guns...
Fuck your link, but while you claim I don't have reading comprehension.
Please quote me saying i'm for the gun banning?
What I said was............ I could care less about the idiots who own assault rifles. Hard for you to see the difference?
Please quote me saying i'm for the gun banning?
What I said was............ I could care less about the idiots who own assault rifles. Hard for you to see the difference?
Re: Well before banning the guns...
As our retards in power are harping on you guys should follow ours and institute a buy back, i wouldnt put it past Obama im sure hes looking for an excuse to spend some more moneyBuzz wrote:I'm not sure how they plan on handling the guns already owned?
-
Pudfark
Re: Well before banning the guns...
No Buzz, what you said was this: "I know my hunter friends could care less about assault guns, or the idiots who own them."Buzz wrote:Fuck your link, but while you claim I don't have reading comprehension.
Please quote me saying i'm for the gun banning?
What I said was............ I could care less about the idiots who own assault rifles. Hard for you to see the difference?
You do seem to have a terminal case of convenience of memory...either that, or it is comprehension/memory/bs malfunction disease.
And...ya shoulda read the link since you advocate for them...by your silence and silly comments....just sayin'
Re: Well before banning the guns...
I'm not sure you're pulling my chain, or are really that dumb?
How in the hell is not caring about assault guns, and those that own them. Mean I want them banned?
So, you'll understand better. I'll try and make it easier for you. I don't care one way or the other whether the guns get banned, or not. It's no concern of mine, because I have no interest in those guns, or those that own them. If they get banned..fine. If they don't get banned...fine. I don't believe it will effect the killings at all. Guns are not the problem. My friends feel the same way.
So, with what I just said. Which is what I already said, and you tried to twist around in your own special way.
WHERE DO YOU GET I'M FOR A GUN BAN?
How in the hell is not caring about assault guns, and those that own them. Mean I want them banned?
So, you'll understand better. I'll try and make it easier for you. I don't care one way or the other whether the guns get banned, or not. It's no concern of mine, because I have no interest in those guns, or those that own them. If they get banned..fine. If they don't get banned...fine. I don't believe it will effect the killings at all. Guns are not the problem. My friends feel the same way.
So, with what I just said. Which is what I already said, and you tried to twist around in your own special way.
WHERE DO YOU GET I'M FOR A GUN BAN?
-
Pudfark
Re: Well before banning the guns...
Glad you've come out of the closet, Buzz.
It's beyond overdue (on this subject) that you've "declared" your position.
" I don't care one way or the other whether the guns get banned, or not. It's no concern of mine, because I have no interest in those guns, or those that own them. If they get banned..fine. If they don't get banned...fine. I don't believe it will effect the killings at all. Guns are not the problem."
"So, with what I just said. Which is what I already said, and you tried to twist around in your own special way."
Nope, you ain't already said it...though, in the first quote, in the same post, you did.
However, you didn't say it before, now.
"WHERE DO YOU GET I'M FOR A GUN BAN?"
Well, from your absolute and damn near total "malaise"/reluctance in making any definitive point about this subject. The keyword here is definitive. Not to mention your inability to quote yer self accurately or others.
It's beyond overdue (on this subject) that you've "declared" your position.
" I don't care one way or the other whether the guns get banned, or not. It's no concern of mine, because I have no interest in those guns, or those that own them. If they get banned..fine. If they don't get banned...fine. I don't believe it will effect the killings at all. Guns are not the problem."
"So, with what I just said. Which is what I already said, and you tried to twist around in your own special way."
Nope, you ain't already said it...though, in the first quote, in the same post, you did.
However, you didn't say it before, now.
"WHERE DO YOU GET I'M FOR A GUN BAN?"
Well, from your absolute and damn near total "malaise"/reluctance in making any definitive point about this subject. The keyword here is definitive. Not to mention your inability to quote yer self accurately or others.
Re: Well before banning the guns...
Quote me anywhere in this thread that I said I was for a gun ban?
I might also ask for an example of misquoting you.
I didn't realize I needed to explain every little detail when I say something to you. I thought you were smart enough to follow a conversation.
Did that confuse you? I can word it another way for you.
I might also ask for an example of misquoting you.
I didn't realize I needed to explain every little detail when I say something to you. I thought you were smart enough to follow a conversation.
Did that confuse you? I can word it another way for you.
Re: Well before banning the guns...
If you can't see that it's a gradual step until they can forbid any kind of gun whatsoever then you're even more dumb than the average liberal.
Nic
Nic
-
Pudfark
Re: Well before banning the guns...
True all that Nic.
See, Buzz...it's like this:
Nobody is able to "follow" what you say. Your idea of communication is to?
Guess what ya mean...or meant to say. Compound that with your misquotes,
misstatements and miss-directions, it's no wonder you perceive yourself as misunderstood. So? Either clean up yer act or say what ya mean...
See, Buzz...it's like this:
Nobody is able to "follow" what you say. Your idea of communication is to?
Guess what ya mean...or meant to say. Compound that with your misquotes,
misstatements and miss-directions, it's no wonder you perceive yourself as misunderstood. So? Either clean up yer act or say what ya mean...
-
Pudfark
Re: Well before banning the guns...
I guess it's really not fair if I don't play some ball with ya, Buzz?
Here ya go:
"WHERE DO YOU GET I'M FOR A GUN BAN?"
From here:
"I don't care one way or the other whether the guns get banned, or not."
I might add....answered and asked...all in your same post made earlier today...
If that's a dab confusing to ya? Look at it like Obama voted in the Senate.."Present" which is not a Yay nor a Nay, simply a "feckit"...meaning as you say I'm to uninformed/stupid to declare a position, therefore, I don't care. Which implies, "take yer choice", "I ain't making one". There, you have it.
Here ya go:
"WHERE DO YOU GET I'M FOR A GUN BAN?"
From here:
"I don't care one way or the other whether the guns get banned, or not."
I might add....answered and asked...all in your same post made earlier today...
If that's a dab confusing to ya? Look at it like Obama voted in the Senate.."Present" which is not a Yay nor a Nay, simply a "feckit"...meaning as you say I'm to uninformed/stupid to declare a position, therefore, I don't care. Which implies, "take yer choice", "I ain't making one". There, you have it.