Page 2 of 2
Re: The Next "Syria"
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 10:59 am
by Pudfark
Sure Slick, your comment/judgement makes it Ok....
That's a great plan...
enhanced armament for unstable governments?
Disarmament for stable governments....like our own.
Your perspective is as good as yer plan.

Re: The Next "Syria"
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 4:34 pm
by callmeslick
no sense trying to explain the premise of three decades of foreign policy to a complete idiot unwilling to learn, so I leave you with your own delusions, Pud.
Re: The Next "Syria"
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 6:32 pm
by Pudfark
So?
Just explain all the "wins" in that there foreign policy
over the last three decades? Then, compare'm to the "losses".

Re: The Next "Syria"
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 7:18 pm
by callmeslick
and, to return to your original (cut and pasted) thinking....explain how Obama had anything to do with the last 3 decades of policy. Or, whether he increased aid, or reduced it, to Egypt. Or, whether you trust the Military or the Islamists in Egypt to have our backs? I'll be glad to explain things when you clarify the utter tripe you've already tossed out.
Re: The Next "Syria"
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 5:57 pm
by Pudfark
callmeslick wrote:Or, whether you trust the Military or the Islamists in Egypt to have our backs?
I don't trust either one of them for nothing...let alone, to have our backs.
Obama chose to give'm the F-16s and tanks. How's about you cutting and pasting
something to substantiate that....and his "stupid" reason for doing so.
There's yer clarification.
Re: The Next "Syria"
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 6:33 pm
by callmeslick
the deal was made 2 years ago, with the Mubarak regime. However, without pasting anything, it's obvious that the thinking is that the military is VERY separate from the Muslim Brotherhood, and keeping them armed and happy might serve as a deterrent, down the road, if the Brotherhood tries to turn a democracy into a dictatorship of Islamists. Further, the Eqyptians are one of the main deterrents to Sudan and others supplying the Palistinian militants in Gaza.
Re: The Next "Syria"
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 8:43 pm
by Pudfark
Total horseshit....to include "armed and happy".
The deal was made with Mubarak, not the military.
Meaning: Mubarak ain't there and there is no deal.
Obama chose of his own volition to arm more radicals.
Remember this?
Nixon/Ford chose to sell the Shaw of Iran one hundred F-14's.
They were delivered.
Carter (another POS) chose not to sell the Iranians the spare
consumable parts after the Shaw died. About the only thing he did that was worth
a shit.
Re: The Next "Syria"
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 8:49 pm
by callmeslick
Pudfark wrote:Total horseshit....to include "armed and happy".
The deal was made with Mubarak, not the military.
if you had the first clue, you would have known that Mubarak came from, and was served by, the military
Meaning: Mubarak ain't there and there is no deal.
Obama chose of his own volition to arm more radicals.
once again, if you had a clue about Egypt....oh, I give up, you've got to figure it out for yourself......
remember this?
Nixon/Ford chose to sell the Shaw of Iran one hundred F-14's.
They were delivered.
Carter (another POS) chose not to sell the Iranians the spare
consumable parts after the Shaw died. About the only thing he did that was worth
a shit.
the Shaw of Iran? okee-dokee..........
Re: The Next "Syria"
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 12:32 pm
by Pudfark
Hurts don't it.
Carter was smarter.
Okie-Dokie...
