Page 2 of 3
Re: Because Fox was almost in danger of being taken seriousl
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 6:02 pm
by Pudfark
I do have a chuckle....every time....y'all get
yer panties in a wad....reading and whining about
the Fox News....I got you to read.
Re: Because Fox was almost in danger of being taken seriousl
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 6:13 pm
by Reservoir_Dog
Pudfark wrote:I do have a chuckle....every time....y'all get
yer panties in a wad....reading and whining about
the Fox News....I got you to read.
Your lame .............
"self" congraulatory .... "chest" thumping ?? ..
is
"about" as ... believable "as" ???????? Scientology !
!
!
.... you actually "believe" you "get"
??? ...... anyone "to" read "that" ??? .... tripe ?????
Your monumental ...... self importance
is "large"
enough.....
"to" ?
have it's own...................................
gravitational "field"!
Re: Because Fox was almost in danger of being taken seriousl
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 6:15 pm
by callmeslick
nice plagarism, Res!
Re: Because Fox was almost in danger of being taken seriousl
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 8:45 pm
by Pudfark
Re: Because Fox was almost in danger of being taken seriousl
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 8:53 pm
by callmeslick
Fox criticism of ANYONE elses journalistic standards is utterly baseless.
Note, that I didn't post anything about that event, because I read the Hartford Courant regularly, and knew the context. If only Pud bothered to check the sensational against realism before he posted......
Re: Because Fox was almost in danger of being taken seriousl
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 9:38 pm
by Reservoir_Dog
callmeslick wrote:If only Pud bothered to check the sensational against realism before he posted......
Yeah, but then how wound he ever be able to post?
Re: Because Fox was almost in danger of being taken seriousl
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:13 pm
by callmeslick
I'd be interested in barbeque recipes......
Re: Because Fox was almost in danger of being taken seriousl
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 9:14 am
by CUDA
callmeslick wrote:
Fox criticism of ANYONE elses journalistic standards is utterly baseless.
Note, that I didn't post anything about that event, because I read the Hartford Courant regularly, and knew the context. If only Pud bothered to check the sensational against realism before he posted......
I have to point out your hypocrisy on this issue. MSNBC has an ugly history of "selective" editing that shows clear blatant bias and flat out lies in their reporting. hello George Zimmerman. if you are going to criticize one outlet, the proper thing would be to do the same to the other instead of dismissing it.
you should probably look at the tapes. MSNBC's and Martin Bashir CLEARLY manipulated the story and told a blatant lie when he said the the witness was heckled. that didn't happen. they edited the story to appear that way. and then reported it to make Gun owners appear in a bad light.
Re: Because Fox was almost in danger of being taken seriousl
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 9:20 am
by callmeslick
CUDA, you are correct, but the discussion here was around FOX, and merely saying, "these guys do stuff, too!" isn't really addressing the point.
Re: Because Fox was almost in danger of being taken seriousl
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 11:15 am
by CUDA
callmeslick wrote:CUDA, you are correct, but the discussion here was around FOX, and merely saying, "these guys do stuff, too!" isn't really addressing the point.
I'm not defending FOX. they clearly are to the right. but to my knowledge they have never done anything as blatant to selectively edit video's to change their meaning. if I'm wrong please show me if I'm incorrect. what I see in this thread is the typical fracturing of society. one side wants to point fingers only at the other side, while ignoring their own warts. and in most cases their own warts are truly hideous.