Re: Condi looks Presidential...
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 8:29 pm
Agreed. I'd voter for Condi any day.
Certainly over everybody last fall.
Certainly over everybody last fall.
Sublime Opinions of the Masses (give or take a few)
https://acompletewasteofspace.com/
still working through those personal gender issues, I see.Barfly wrote:Any reference to Condi is probably going to have some political perspective, that's why you posted this Slick? Comparing her activity to that of another politician? While we're at it, she's a better woman than Barry Obama, and would be a dramatically better President.
Nah... I know a good woman when I see one... and a bad one toocallmeslick wrote:still working through those personal gender issues, I see.Barfly wrote:Any reference to Condi is probably going to have some political perspective, that's why you posted this Slick? Comparing her activity to that of another politician? While we're at it, she's a better woman than Barry Obama, and would be a dramatically better President.
first off, she has long stated NO INTEREST in running. Which, is what gets a person into trouble when they get talked into it. I suspect that she has far too many issues, starting with letting 9/11 occur on her watch, to get far. Plus, getting a black nominee through the Republican primary season would be about as likely as you ever passing High School.HappyHappy wrote:Connie would have split the Black vote and beaten the Kenyan.
I hope she runs in 2016!
HH
9-11 started on Clinton's watch. It was his failure. He was warned. Reference Col. North.callmeslick wrote:first off, she has long stated NO INTEREST in running. Which, is what gets a person into trouble when they get talked into it. I suspect that she has far too many issues, starting with letting 9/11 occur on her watch, to get far. Plus, getting a black nominee through the Republican primary season would be about as likely as you ever passing High School.HappyHappy wrote:Connie would have split the Black vote and beaten the Kenyan.
I hope she runs in 2016!
HH
you mean the convicted felon, Col. North? Clinton acted on intelligence, Bush and Condi ignored that which they were provided. Sorry, Pud, just wrong.Pudfark wrote:9-11 started on Clinton's watch. It was his failure. He was warned. Reference Col. North.
yes, I am.So, you're sayin the Republicans are racist.
[/quote]So, predictable from you Slick...your rants of stupidity, racism and "you're stupid", repeated.
which, no doubt, was why he targeted Bin Laden twice with cruise missles. It is a shame that his Defense and State depts got all antsy on a third try over killing Saudi and Bahraini state officials, because all reports have it that they would've gotten him on that one.Pudfark wrote:Clinton ignored North's testimony on Bin Laden.
are you referring to Oliver North, or not?So you're saying that North is a "convicted felon".
Apparently on the date of September 16, 1991...you were asleep.