3D Mark 03 first pull
61,273 with NVIDIA MSI N560GTX-TI 2X SLI and AMD Athlon 64 FX Processor-74
3D 03 is so fast it seems to be unstable with widely varying scores pull to pull.
=============
3D Mark 05 first pull, no tweeks (runs on XP)
17791 with NVIDIA MSI N560GTX-TI 2X SLI and AMD Athlon 64 FX Processor-74
CPU Score 18114
3D Mark 05 shows a 15% gain, again the cpu is marginally higher
=============
3D Mark 06 first pull, no tweeks (runs on XP)
14380 with NVIDIA MSI N560GTX-TI 2X SLI and AMD Athlon 64 FX Processor-74
SM2.0 Score 5379
HDR/SM3.0 Score 7330
CPU Score 3742 (same CPUs, odd increase)
Note a marginal improvement despite being SLI vs quad SLI. Newer cards...
=============
3D Mark VANTAGE run.
First pull, no tweeks.
GPU score 21993 (about 10% better)
CPU score 9141 (weird, WAY lower! Seems they changed the way it is scored)
=============
3D Mark 11 run.
First pull, no tweeks.
P5468 (so called 3D Mark score)
GPU score 9115 (about 10% better)
Physics/CPU score 2547
=============
3D Mark Basic (May 2013 release)
First pull, no tweeks.
3D Mark score 4859
ICE STORM 61984
CLOUD GATE 9904
Fire Strike 4859 (DX11)
I have no idea how this stacks up but the BS posted
on the Futuremark site places my ancient rig still above
average (over 50% of game PC's out there).
Can't believe them as they are sponsored by people selling hardware
Tweeking the buggers out of it dragged the
3D Mark score up to 5129 from 4859 in the last test.
Small changes that most gamers do in the card settings.
According their data that ranks this old rig above 63% of
tested PC's at their site. Not bad for an ancient computer.
HH